douglasallen91
Bench
- Messages
- 4,051
Dantm said:Convenient for the Ram-rooters to leave off the last two Olympic Games.
go back and read the post again convict!
Dantm said:Convenient for the Ram-rooters to leave off the last two Olympic Games.
Dantm said:By the way,how pathetic do NZ compete at a Winter Olympics considering the ideal climate and landscape...
PATHETIC!
ozbash said:what is that mate :lol:
Iafeta said:Ozbash bro, trying to make sense with these Aussies is like finding a needle in the haystack.
Just got to remember, even Demir and Jelena Dokic ditched them
how many aussies compete for aussie??? about 70%Twizzle said:how many pomms swan for New Zealand yesterday ?
gunnamatta bay said:I think the size of each team should be the means by which you decide who is the more successful country at the games. Population has nothing to do with it. i.e. India.
douglasallen91 said:how many aussies compete for aussie??? about 70%
douglasallen91 said:where did that post go, oh i see you can;t mention any thing about a certain team drug cheating.
douglasallen91 said:medals for aussies that wern't born their
bronze lara carroll (english) 200 individual medley
silver michael klim (poland) 4*100m medley
racing today (17th march)
matthew targett (english)
womens basketball
jay cross (nz)
womens hockey
rachael immison (nz)
bowls
not even going to look at them way too many of them.
rugby 7's
cameron sheppard (england)
lote tuquiri (fiji)
table tennis (women)
stephanie sang (china)
may cho (malaysia)
those are the ones that have competed so far
douglasallen91 said:yeah ur right cause the higher the population just means u have more losers.
gunnamatta bay said:If the warriors finish in say tenth place should they be announced the moral winners too. They represent NZ don't they? Like the breakers and your soccer team whoever they are.
douglasallen91 said:no they don;t they are club teams idiot.