Willow said:Reports say no one was charged this round Pando.Moffo, surely you know that's rubbish. Plenty of dangerous tackles get cited and charged. They don't have to land on their head to make it so. The MRC are notoriously inconsistent in this regard.
El Diablo said:hate? lol
i pity you
Moffo said:save it for the TFC, no one wants to read petulant fights in here
bigdogsgottaeat said:Oh boy is this a typical thread of the big sooks otherwise known as Dragons fans.
Said fans having a cry about the only thing they can take out of Friday night's game - because they certainly can't take a result out of it.
Cry me a river Dragons. He would've been back for our next victory over you anyway, get over it. We could beat you with our hands tied behind our backs.
Father Ted said:I bet I can guess what you normally beat .
And many other have been charged. You're still missing the point.Moffo said:ok, so what makes it dangerous
a) hand between the legs
b) what part of the defender lands on the ground first
c) the injury suffered
for mine willow, and i watch a fair bit of footy, i quite often see hands going in between the legs. But this quite often brings no punishment
Now for mine, SBW's tackle did not result in an injury and he landed on his back
So, its inconsistent, as you say. But for mine, SBW was let off in the same way that many others have been this year.
Stupid bloody trolls. Sometimes its impossible to avoid the infestation.bigdogsgottaeat said:Oh boy is this a typical thread of the big sooks otherwise known as Dragons fans.
Said fans having a cry about the only thing they can take out of Friday night's game - because they certainly can't take a result out of it.
Cry me a river Dragons. He would've been back for our next victory over you anyway, get over it. We could beat you with our hands tied behind our backs.
Willow said:And many other have been charged. You're still missing the point.
It is dangerous because it is above the horizontal. A lifting tackle made worse by the hand between the legs. The NRL were supposed to be cracking down on these lifting tackles. For a while they did, then they stopped, then they are again, or are they? Inconsistent... that being the point of the thread.
Willow said:They're not having a good year.
In my opinion, they improved for a little while after Jim Hall was sacked for being too inconsistent. But it didnt take long for them to slip back.
bigdogsgottaeat said:Oh boy is this a typical thread of the big sooks otherwise known as Dragons fans.
Said fans having a cry about the only thing they can take out of Friday night's game - because they certainly can't take a result out of it.
Cry me a river Dragons. He would've been back for our next victory over you anyway, get over it. We could beat you with our hands tied behind our backs.