BranVan3000
Coach
- Messages
- 12,290
Most halves are rubbish, but it amazes me how effective a tackler adam Reynolds is for someone his size
Well he is built like a nugget
Most halves are rubbish, but it amazes me how effective a tackler adam Reynolds is for someone his size
You need to scan an opal card when you run past/through Soward.
Well he is built like a nugget
Myth based on one GI moment
I can't believe it took until page 2 for Reece to receive a mention.Reece Robinson is woeful and Jeremy Hawkins was terrible last night against the Warriors.
90% of halves are pretty average in defence. They're typically small builds with nowhere near the muscle other players carry, and they tend to have the biggest players on the field running at them.
But so long as they do enough to slow the player down for others to help complete it, there's nothing wrong with that. It's when you have pea hearted efforts where they barely put a hand out to touch the defender as his runs through. Luke Walsh used to love those sorts of tackles.
I can't believe it took until page 2 for Reece to receive a mention.
He flat out dogs it in defence... a straight up coward who won't put his body on the line.
I also recall Milford getting out of Vatuvei's way last year which was hilarious :lol:
And yes halves generally aren't the best defenders. I think that's what made Joey and Freddy, and Lozza, so great. Amazing in attack but some of the best defenders you'll ever see.
And I'm a big believer in the value of defending when rating players. It's a two way sport so if you can't defend as well as attack then in my mind you're a severely flawed footballer.
Eg Lockyer langer and Thurston = highly overrated
Eg Lockyer langer and Thurston = highly overrated
Defence is just as important as attack which is why johns should always be considered better then Thurston
Up until last year Nathan Merritt would have taken the gold medal. Of the current players I would have to say Ben Hunt over Sandow. At least Sandow can put on a decent hit for a little fella.
attack is also important
especially in the halves
that's why langer lockyer and thurston are better than johns
attack is also important
especially in the halves
that's why langer lockyer and thurston are better than johns
Johns: attack 10/10 defence 9/10 total 19/20
Lockyer: attack 10/10 defence 5/10 total 15/20
Thurston: attack 10/10 defence 4/10 total 14/20
Langer: attack 9/10 defence 7/10 total 16/20
Johns: attack 10/10 defence 9/10 total 19/20
Lockyer: attack 10/10 defence 5/10 total 15/20
Thurston: attack 10/10 defence 4/10 total 14/20
Langer: attack 9/10 defence 7/10 total 16/20