Now Phil, please present to us essay on how they manage to keep that many quality players under the cap.
Promote from successful junior development systems and pay big money for key positions.
Don't pay premium money for players to sit in reserves.
Don't pay premium money for players to play at other clubs.
Don't pay overs for anyone except top 5 in the game players.
Pay unders for talented discards from other clubs.
Be attractive to recruits by having the best facilities, development, coaches, connections, opportunities, perks.
Rep teams
Not clubs
*brown paper perks
I reckon professional rep teams do a bit more quality development than Billy's dad's mate coaching the under 14s. But god if we had Penrith or Newcastle sized districts we'd be untouchable.
Fact, Roosters do twice the junior rep development of other Sydney clubs.
Not our fault that somehow other clubs can't find success with the advantage of 10x the number of juniors sitting in their lap.
Tedesco
Keary
Mitchell
All million $ players.
Cordner
Cronk
$700k
JWH
Friend
Morris
$500k
The remaining $4 mill is going a long way lol
Cronk was bought for one single reason, to do what Pearce couldn’t, win a premiership. It was said one million times.
The premiership was bought, this thread has zero credibility.
You could include Tedesco in that too.
Even in the 70's, premierships were being bought. Manly did it, and Easts did it. The salary cap was supposed to stop that happening though. For all the effect it has in evening out the competition, they might as well scrap it. All it does is stop the poor clubs going broke trying to compete with the rich clubs.
Now Phil, please present to us essay on how they manage to keep that many quality players under the cap.
Are you saying the roosters don't put money in to their junior league?
If being a "development club" is the path to untold player riches, why is it that the development club that Gould is General Manager of, has released 3 quality players this year without signing comparable replacements?Deliberately missed the point, as Gus usually does.
If being a "development club" is the path to untold player riches, why is it that the development club that Gould is General Manager of, has released 3 quality players this year without signing comparable replacements?
No - being a "development club" is a path to mediocrity. Being a "skim the cream" club is where it's at.
Sure he did, and then failed every year after.Erm except Pearce did win a premiership admittedly with Money Bill back.
He doesn’t want to burn bridges in case he needs a job back there again.Phil Gould said when Melbourne was caught cheating the salary cap that the punishment was too severe because all clubs basically fiddle with the books and cheat the salary cap. I always wondered which club or clubs Gould was referring to when he made that statement.
Maybe they should have investigated the club he worked with for the previous decade.
Is that like an ATM machine?WCC challenge