- Messages
- 100,958
FFS you are kidding yourself, i thought Tahu was quite controlled in the circumstances. Hide behind the rule book all you want, Tahu was bitten he reacted, nothing would of happened if moron didn't bite him.
Are you seriously reading a thing?
RETALIATING = AGAINST THE RULES.
HITTING SOMEONE IN THE HEAD = AGAINST THE RULES.
Morrin bit him - there's no denying that. The grub should be rubbed out for the rest of the 'Dogs games for it.
Yes - Tahu had a right to be pissed off.
NO - Tahu didn't have a right to start hitting him in the head.
Is it that hard to comprehend? I'm trying to explain why the penalty went to Canterbury and you're trying to excuse Tahu giving a slap which is against the rules.
In summary:
I don't condone the actions of either.
You don't condone Morrin's actions but think Tahu should've been able to take a shot at Morrin and not be in trouble for it. They aren't how the rules work mate. It's why we have referees.