It often takes time for scientific theory to be accepted but we are talking rugby league on a league forum. People here certainly have the intellect to understand your terrible Merritt arguments.
If Amadaca posts on multiple super intelligent science forums, why did he choose the dullard commoner league site to be the one he chose to ask him with his sleeping problems?
Perhaps you should consult your physician mate. Either the dosage needs to be increased or you have simply stopped taking your meds and are heading towards another manic episode
Ferguson didn't make a play at anyone, he fell over in front of Inglis after he shit himself. He didn't even touch Inglis or Boyd :lol:As discussed previously Ferguson had to make a play at Inglis or Inglis would have strolled over. If you are going to blame anyone, Morris was the one who missed the tackle on GI that put Ferguson in a 2 on 1 situation a metre out from the line. :crazy:
Did you even watch the game?
1) What makes you think this is the only forum I asked that question on?
2) I'm not on meds & do not need to be.
Ferguson didn't make a play at anyone, he fell over in front of Inglis after he shit himself. He didn't even touch Inglis or Boyd :lol:
Ferguson is completing well over 80% of all tackles he attempts this year.
Merritt is completing about 65%
There is simply no basis to argue that Merritt should be selected over ANYONE for defence. He is quite easily the worst defender of any backline player mentioned in this thread
Ferguson didn't make a play at anyone, he fell over in front of Inglis after he shit himself. He didn't even touch Inglis or Boyd :lol:
He is not the best attacker in any way, shape, or form. Scoring tries is not the be all and end all of attack.
Ask 16 x NRL coaches, plus all origin and international coaches who they would consider a better attacking weapon out of ferguson and Merritt. Unless Maguire chooses to back his own man ferguson will clean sweep that poll