This has been raised several times before. Bennett would likely have stayed on if not offered the Tinkler big cash, which we could never have matched. Our winning the comp in 2010 made his decision all the easier as it was mission accomplished here. So the 3 or 5 year deal is a hollow argument - and coaches contracts are inherently rubbery, e.g. Hasler. So IMO Doust should be spared criticism on this front, remember he was responsible for bringing him to the club in the first place.[/QUOTE
Sorry I haven't seen anything you or anyone has said that makes it a hollow arguement . Doust stuffed up on the contract and no amount of revisionist history will ever change that .Certainly not the old whats a contract worth debate . Let Doust answer for own mistakes I'm sure he can come up with a wonderfully incomprehensable piece of Techno babble . I for one miss the old speeches full of Key performance indicators, Shareholders and that old favourite about being the right shape. After all Moltzen was the right shape wasn't he?