The precedent's already set, it's been done heaps of times, think Farrah and clubs who have moved on non-performers while paying part of their wage.It's already the norm huh? Tell me where. I'd like to know where clubs have paid out a player where the player (and not the club) requested a release to join another club.
As I said, you set a bad precedent by paying him anything in these circumstances. Hayne wants out for his own selfish reasons. As such if he requests a release, the Titans would be under zero obligation to pay him out. Doing so would be bad business in the long term. Do you seriously think teams like the Broncos, Bulldogs or Roosters would pay a player out if they were in the Titans position? Of course they wouldn't as their management would know it makes bad business sense long term as it sets a bad precedent.
Also where are the Titans going to find the 1-2 first grade players for 2018 at this stage of the year? There aren't exactly that many who are unsigned this late in the year who are going to be in the mid-tier price range.
And, after the delays in reaching agreement btw the NRL and the RLPA, there's been endless stories about players whose careers are in limbo, I'd imagine there'd be some handy buys among them for the Titans looking to strengthen key positions.