What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brisbane3 - What is needed to make it a successful bid?

Red&BlackBear

First Grade
Messages
5,801
Obviously this is no slight at you and you're sharing the latest whispers, but regarding Robina, a cursory look at GoogleMaps advises it's over an hour drive time from Ipswich to Robina and about half that time from Ipswich to Lang Park.

For a new side, in it's infancy trying to build a presence in the Brisbane market which already has 2 sides in, it doesn't seem to make sense for me (as an outsider) to have a South Queensland Jets playing out of Robina when even the Titans struggles to draw large there.

Does Ipswich not have enough coin to run this NRL expansion side themselves (unlike Redcliffe) so getting Easts involved helps firm up the financials or is it to get Easts off the table as a Brisbane expansion option/noise?
Hence why this one proposal is called South Queensland and not directly Ipswich. The point of it is to encompass all of SQ.

Admittedly the other proposals are much better on paper and are being actively worked on which is the reason I can’t go into them yet.

I shared this one because of the idea of it.

Ikin is an idiot. Success of dolphins is model to follow
No other team can directly follow Dolphins model unless they’re Tigers stand alone. Jets have assets but not the cash resources. But Jets are also the preferred brand by a country mile.

You’re right

But since ikin seems to think playing games at Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast is a good option for a sw Brisbane team I think we can ignore him

Qrl has muppets running them

If they link with the (Brisbane) tigers then maybe it’s a stronger bid
This isn’t Ikin’s idea. He has 0 to do with the proposals. They are merely put in front of him and Brian for their opinions.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
41,150

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,771
Never said it couldn't sustain one, It doesnt surprise me youve once again misrepresented what I've said. I said I dont think the comp needs a third Brisbane team.

Strength of NRL is Sydney. For AFL it's Melbourne. Brisbane has potential for numerous well supported clubs.

Hence why this one proposal is called South Queensland and not directly Ipswich. The point of it is to encompass all of SQ.

Admittedly the other proposals are much better on paper and are being actively worked on which is the reason I can’t go into them yet.

I shared this one because of the idea of it.


No other team can directly follow Dolphins model unless they’re Tigers stand alone. Jets have assets but not the cash resources. But Jets are also the preferred brand by a country mile.


This isn’t Ikin’s idea. He has 0 to do with the proposals. They are merely put in front of him and Brian for their opinions.

Dolphins approach is to target a particular region. That approach is needed in southern Brisbane.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,771

This was actually a good bid esp if singo was putting in money

Can’t see how a merger with easts tigers would work like if they train at langlands park what’s Ipswich got to do with it

Looking back on it they should’ve admitted easts tigers and not the broncos and possibly the dolphins back in the 80s and 90s

I don't know how rich those club were in the 80's with joh's pokies ban.
 

steeden.

Juniors
Messages
841
Can’t see how a merger with easts tigers would work like if they train at langlands park what’s Ipswich got to do with it

Looking back on it they should’ve admitted easts tigers and not the broncos and possibly the dolphins back in the 80s and 90s
Easts getting to own an NRL team is probably their goal, I guess. They’d have so much money without anything much to do with it. Can’t have a team called the tigers, can’t really have another team based in Brisbane. Ipswich is a means to an end?

admitting the Broncos was the right choice. Tigers and Phins had their own fans that others may not have got behind. Plus they’re only rich through pokies, which weren’t introduced until 1992
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
7,252
Obviously this is no slight at you and you're sharing the latest whispers, but regarding Robina, a cursory look at GoogleMaps advises it's over an hour drive time from Ipswich to Robina and about half that time from Ipswich to Lang Park.

For a new side, in it's infancy trying to build a presence in the Brisbane market which already has 2 sides in, it doesn't seem to make sense for me (as an outsider) to have a South Queensland Jets playing out of Robina when even the Titans struggles to draw large there.

Does Ipswich not have enough coin to run this NRL expansion side themselves (unlike Redcliffe) so getting Easts involved helps firm up the financials or is it to get Easts off the table as a Brisbane expansion option/noise?
Ipswich have the population, RL juniors and Easts Tigers have the money.

They don't need to build any presence the Jets are synonymous with Ipswich right now, without an NRL club. The CBus idea is moronic, but it's temporary as the side would eventually play out of Ipswich. Personally, I'd just play them at Suncorp until the North Ipswich Reserve stadium is ready.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,708
I’m not as confident about Adelaide having success … they are more AFL obsessed than Perth , it’s also a much smaller city and not as wealthy …and don’t have a history of the game over there unlike Perth ..I don’t see a lot of point to them other than just for the sake of having a team there ( nothing personal to anyone from Adelaide reading this …)
The reason is that it's a major capital city in Australia.

How can we expect the town to be into Rugby League when we've all but ignored it got 120 years?

It's not like Melbourne was some RL hotbed in 1998.
 

Red&BlackBear

First Grade
Messages
5,801
Strength of NRL is Sydney. For AFL it's Melbourne. Brisbane has potential for numerous well supported clubs.



Dolphins approach is to target a particular region. That approach is needed in southern Brisbane.
I have to disagree with you there. The whole Dolphins calling themselves just Dolphins with no geographical connection in their name very much lines up with the main point that they made of trying to appeal as “Queensland’s” other team.

Their appeal and support isn’t contained to a particular region. There’s as much NRL Dolphins support in southern Brisbane as there is in northern Brisbane. The idea for Jets is to copy that same wider appeal model.


Ipswich have the population, RL juniors and Easts Tigers have the money.

They don't need to build any presence the Jets are synonymous with Ipswich right now, without an NRL club. The CBus idea is moronic, but it's temporary as the side would eventually play out of Ipswich. Personally, I'd just play them at Suncorp until the North Ipswich Reserve stadium is ready.
CBus proposal is no more than a temporary political move. Short term; to have another potential tenant to ensure upkeep and maintenance costs are at least equal to what the hire costs are. Currently, there’s a discrepancy with only Titans (both NRL and NRLW) teams playing there. Why all games couldn’t be at Suncorp is because of the early season cluster. 8 proposed games at Suncorp would be later in the season once super rugby and a league comps conclude.

Toowoomba is because Wagners are hovering as potential commercial partners. Sunshine Coast is because that ground is getting an Olympics upgrade. Dolphins will take a game there once those works conclude as well (that’s a fact).



This was actually a good bid esp if singo was putting in money

Can’t see how a merger with easts tigers would work like if they train at langlands park what’s Ipswich got to do with it

Looking back on it they should’ve admitted easts tigers and not the broncos and possibly the dolphins back in the 80s and 90s
Singo promises and rarely delivers. Further to this the NRL have moved away from guys like him decades ago. They enjoy his wider support but they shun any direct involvement with clubs. Under this proposal Jets would train and be based in Ipswich. Tigers would be commercial partners and a direct feeder (like Ipswich). Again, repeating myself here - these clubs have already jumped into bed to form a bid together in the past. This isn’t something new.

I’ve been doing some preliminary work with the people involved in the Jets concepts. No where as in-depth as my Bears involvement. Not even close really. Again, I need to stress this was one of a couple proposals and if I’m flagging it in detail here it likely means it’s not a candidate to move forward on.

I’ll share the others once they’re ready to be shared.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,771
I have to disagree with you there. The whole Dolphins calling themselves just Dolphins with no geographical connection in their name very much lines up with the main point that they made of trying to appeal as “Queensland’s” other team.

Their appeal and support isn’t contained to a particular region. There’s as much NRL Dolphins support in southern Brisbane as there is in northern Brisbane. The idea for Jets is to copy that same wider appeal model.



CBus proposal is no more than a temporary political move. Short term; to have another potential tenant to ensure upkeep and maintenance costs are at least equal to what the hire costs are. Currently, there’s a discrepancy with only Titans (both NRL and NRLW) teams playing there. Why all games couldn’t be at Suncorp is because of the early season cluster. 8 proposed games at Suncorp would be later in the season once super rugby and a league comps conclude.

Toowoomba is because Wagners are hovering as potential commercial partners. Sunshine Coast is because that ground is getting an Olympics upgrade. Dolphins will take a game there once those works conclude as well (that’s a fact).



Singo promises and rarely delivers. Further to this the NRL have moved away from guys like him decades ago. They enjoy his wider support but they shun any direct involvement with clubs. Under this proposal Jets would train and be based in Ipswich. Tigers would be commercial partners and a direct feeder (like Ipswich). Again, repeating myself here - these clubs have already jumped into bed to form a bid together in the past. This isn’t something new.

I’ve been doing some preliminary work with the people involved in the Jets concepts. No where as in-depth as my Bears involvement. Not even close really. Again, I need to stress this was one of a couple proposals and if I’m flagging it in detail here it likely means it’s not a candidate to move forward on.

I’ll share the others once they’re ready to be shared.

If you wanted to appeal to all of South east Qld you wouldn't keep jets name which is synonymous with Ipswich. Dolphins point you made is hard to believe particularly when their back up grounds are in Redcliffe and on the sunshine coast; clearly targeting the north.
 

BuffaloRules

Coach
Messages
16,677
The reason is that it's a major capital city in Australia.

How can we expect the town to be into Rugby League when we've all but ignored it got 120 years?

It's not like Melbourne was some RL hotbed in 1998.

Well ..your entitled to your opinion as I am mine

I will say though that Melbourne is a much bigger city and economic powerhouse of the country in comparison with Adelaide…and worth the struggle that they have had to endure for arguably modest results to date…particularly with local elite/ NRL players that have been produced from there …Im sure that it helps with sponsorship and TV money though … Adelaide…not so much IMO
 

Latest posts

Top