Ad hominem hyperbole is such an underrated strategy in arguing a point of view. No need to go further, you've convinced me an dIm sure everyone else here with your towering intellect.
Im getting mixed signals, what is the reason that the Tigers are shit? Is it me or not?
No I dont. And Mr Comprehension, I havent argued that at all. I am arguing, with empirical data that those players are not the reason he left. It doesnt matter what you think, not only did Galvin seek a release twice before all of those players were signed.......he and his agent literally issued a 7 point dossier of why he would not be staying at the Tigers and none of the points were "I dont like these new polynesian pricks you signed.". Even further than that, out of his own mouth, multiple times in a number of interviews he said that he was leaving because the club and Benji couldnt make him a better player, HE ACTUALLY SAID IT, HIS MANAGER ISSUED A DOSSIER......but 85 baby knows better.
Delusional is thinking you know better than Lachlan Galvin and Isaac Moses as to why Lachlan Galvin left the Tigers, particularly in the face of all data, actual facts. And you are not implying anything Mr Comprehension, you actually said that he left because of the signing of Api, Luai et al....despite the fact that Galvin signed a new 3 year deal a YEAR after Api debuted with the club. Thinking you know more than Galvin, Moses and Api is delusional.
Also 85 Baby - "I think you’re delusional if you believe, if not for the signings of Luai, Api, et al giving your management a bit of backbone, that Benji would still be your coach and Galvin would’ve continued to request release."
Galvin sought a release from the Tigers three times because he thought he was something special and he thought the Tigers were shit. its not that hard. He said so himself.