Shows why the decision at the toss was the right one, the 2nd and 3rd innings of the game were always going to be good for batting, difference is the team batting last also has the pressure on them of trying to win
Better to put the touring side under that pressure, the team down 1-0 in the series than be chasing yourself against a quality spinner in Kaneria
cricinfo said:
Ponting: "The wicket was challenging and the way the guys struck out was wonderful, the first half an hour would have told the story, how the game was going. we held on to our catches and the boys bowled well. Yousuf's wicket was massive and Haddin's catch was excellent, once we exposed the Pakistan tail the game was over. A great win for us and the boys will celebrate. Not many changes at Hobart and all of guys were terrific."
You're overreacting. We can't be number 1 all of the time. Just that so many people have been spoilt who only followed the game the last 10-15 years. They didn't follow the game back in the 80's when we were struggling under Border. When I first started following cricket at age 6 or so we'd won only 1 test or so in 3 years and we were the West Indies bitches.
The team never should have been bowled out that cheaply because as much movement as there was, most of the shots were shocking starting from the topdo you think the decision to put your team in a position to make 127 the first innings was the right one ?
shows a total lack of lateral thinking imo
:lol: I wonder if he knows what the word 'terrific' means, I feel like calling them mediocre would even be kind
Pakistan have to bat on this wicket, barring the weather, I still think we can win this.
Overreacting???
I lived through the eighties so I know what that was like
But what is so wrong with expecting to be number 1 or even in the top 3 all the time. It is those who strive to maintain greatness who stay great. Those with pathetic excuses like 'we are can't be great all the time' are the ones who are doomed to failure. I don't accept lame excuses like this. No one should. At the moment we are not equal with the Poms, South Africans, or the Indians. They are heads and shoulders above us. These two series have shown us we are about level with the Pakistanis, West Indies and the New Zealanders. We have been dead lucky this summer against two of the worse current cricket nations AND if we lost a few more tosses OR if those two teams could catch AND if they both didn't have major injuries to key players we would not be 'sucking each other's dicks' about this victory. If there are no changes made between now and next summer we are going to get a major hiding from the English ...
Australia were $9 at the start of the day. Kicking myself I didn't get on ...this is surely the most suspect result in cricketing history
what were australia paying to win after their 2nd innings? Anyone who had the balls to put their money on the aussies to win made out like bandits... wonder if any paki's get in on that action... like the fans?
another disappointing thing is we did not have great crowds at the SCG any day of this test, including Jane McGrath day:crazy:
The Rankings are not important to me personally. We've only lost 1 home series in 1993. Over a LONG period of time we have been the best cricketing nation. Naturally others have caught up since Warne, Gilchrist, McGrath and Langer retired. We don't have as strong a team anymore but we're still right in the thick of things. You could say we were a bit unlucky to lose the Ashes and also the loss to South Africa last summer was quite close.
When was the last time England were even competitive in Australia? not since they beat us in 1986/87 that's a FACT. I don't care what the rankings say England are still ordinary and are only a few key injuries away from being poor. A drawn series could be a threat but I hardly fear a loss. Of course a drawn series and they'd retain the Ashes, so obviously we need to beat them.
I think barmy army are some of the best cricket supporters there is, I would love to join them for theupcoming ashes. I know the ashes tickets went on sale to the barmy army a couple of weeks ago (I got an email about it), I believe they don't even go on sale here for a couple of monthsUnfortunately it's the norm so not unexpected. People will be bitching they can't get any tickets next year because the barmy army will take them all but if they're prepared to travel to the other side of the world to see their team play and we can't even go to see ours play in the same city then we don't deserve them. Simple as that.
Melbourne crowds were great, Sydney crowds were very disappointing ... which definitely makes Melbourne look the better from a cricket Australia perspectiveSCG - 3 great test matches in a row.
Sydney is the cricketing capital of Australia. f**k off Melbourne.
Agreed.SCG - 3 great test matches in a row.
Sydney is the cricketing capital of Australia. f**k off Melbourne.
"Not many changes in hobart"
Put through the angry Ponting translater
"I have no man love for Hughes he can f**k off and hopefully all the boys I do have man love for are fit to play"