Beau Scott/Matt Prior - try/no try

[gUt]

The ref and big Bill said it was a try , so.... you are wrong.

They said Gasnier's last year was a try too and we all know there is no way that should have been awar... oh wait he's a Dragon, carry on.

 

[Western Saint]

They said Gasnier's last year was a try to and we all know there is no way that should have been awar... oh wait he's a Dragon, carry on.

Finally people are learning :crazy:

 

[Version 6]

They said Gasnier's last year was a try to and we all know there is no way that should have been awar... oh wait he's a Dragon, carry on.

Harrigan actually said that was the wrong decision following the game.

 

[gUt]

He called it a try when it mattered.

 

[Hutty1986]

They said Gasnier's last year was a try too and we all know there is no way that should have been awar... oh wait he's a Dragon, carry on.

:lol::lol::lol: Bullsh*t

 

[Willow]

He called it a try when it mattered.

Was that the one where the try was "near completion" in the sense that it had just been completed?

The tackle was "near completion" in the sense that it had just been completed.

 

[gUt]

I think you probably misunderstood what I meant Willow. I will rephrase it. The tackle was completed in my opinion.

 

[Willow]

The tackle was "near completion" in the sense that it had just been completed.

Question for you and Packy. Are you ever going to get over it? Maybe "near over it"?

 

[gUt]

No, never.

 

[aussie7798]

I think you probably misunderstood what I meant Willow. I will rephrase it. The tackle was completed in my opinion.

Well the rule book says that the tackle was not completed and i think the NRL is probably using the rule book and not your (incorrect)opinion

 

[Dragon Dave]

I think you probably misunderstood what I meant Willow. I will rephrase it. The tackle was completed in my opinion.

So if Scott had been facing the other way and instead of giving the ball to Prior, simply lowered him arms to ground the ball, that would be double movement?

 

[Packy]

yet you were disgusted by the decision, are you saying your ok with it now?

Stop eating paint chips. No. I still feel the decision was stupid. However, my post was in context to the post I quoted. Get it yet? Need diagrams?

 

[Packy]

Question for you and Packy. Are you ever going to get over it? Maybe "near over it"?

As I said previously. Over the result. We weren't even the better team. Doesn't change how I view the item of discussion. If we want to go back in history of "getting over things" we can always go back to 2009 when Soward wasn't impeded yet got a penalty due to a mistake by the refs. Like that one?

I am just prone to replying to the last word merchants here. Which I guess makes me one of them.. which makes it a paradox.

Deal with it.

 

[Western Saint]

Deal with it.

no. never.

 

[Western Saint]

Stop eating paint chips. No. I still feel the decision was stupid. However, my post was in context to the post I quoted. Get it yet? Need diagrams?

Doesn't make you any less wrong

 

[gUt]

So if Scott had been facing the other way and instead of giving the ball to Prior, simply lowered him arms to ground the ball, that would be double movement?

Putting the ball on the ground is not passing it to a team mate. If Hazem had passed it in that GF instead of fighting for a good 3-4 seconds in the in goal before eventually putting it on the deck he would have been penalized (corrections welcome).

 

[Hutty1986]

Beaunhead should have ducked low and scored himself in the first place anyway, the big doofus.

 

[Willow]

As I said previously. Over the result. We weren't even the better team. Doesn't change how I view the item of discussion. If we want to go back in history of "getting over things" we can always go back to 2009 when Soward wasn't impeded yet got a penalty due to a mistake by the refs. Like that one?

2009?

Oh yeah... you're over it. :lol:

I am just prone to replying to the last word merchants here. Which I guess makes me one of them.. which makes it a paradox.

No, it just means you can't understand the rules of the game. Don't feel bad, it happens to the best of them.

Deal with it.

LOL. I'm dealing with it fine. It was a try. We won, you lost. And we're even winning the vote.

Come over to the light Packy... folks are much happier here.

 

[Willow]

no. never.

lol

 

[Bucket]

was a try on 2 counts...1. the tackle still had momentum when the ball was handed off and his arms were still off the ground....why is anyone even arguing otherwise? it's clear cut, it only looks as if the tackle was completed in mega slow mo