Lewis to play out his final year with us with the only goal to finish 2nd last above Parramatta. It's a joke the way the club is run, even with Elliott gone it's still a ship with noone at the wheel.
Would look good in a Manly jersey.
Would look good in a Manly jersey.
Yes and it wouldn't have been a recent thing either. Wouldn't surprise me if Gould sat down at the beginning of the year with a plan to nab a star half, he looks at the roster and sees Jennings and Gordon on relatively big dollars. Gordon is the first to go but Jennings doesn't sell as he is too overpriced, so he is forced to go down this path. Thurston kind of makes sense. Having Segeyaro would mean he doesn't need to form a completely new combination as well. A one club veteran player doesn't wake up one morning and go I want to leave, it is a decision that is made over a long period of time. And it doesn't make sense that he doesn't want to rebuild. Surely he would be there in 2014 playing alongside a hypothetical JT.I've been hearing all over the news that Lewis asked to leave.
Bullshit. He was pushed and pushed hard. If that's the justification the Panthers are sheeting home and expecting people to believe then they're going nowhere and they're very badly led.
Sorry, but whose is in fact correct.Originally Posted by Cliffhanger
Firstly, it's "who's".
Sorry, but whose is in fact correct.
You just got schooled by Bunniesman, no?
Firstly, it's "who's".
Secondly, Marion Jones never had her name associated with cheating. But you just had to take one look at her objectively and it was pretty damn obvious something was not right.
Thirdly, I said it was unlikely they hadn't been aided by special substances. really think about it, yes these guys train more than the average person. But, human beings still have physical limitations.
You're welcome. Here's another nugget from the great mind that is Buzz.
Rothfield is wrong a lot of the time.
But IMO he might just be accidentally right this time. They're supposedly building an empire but you don't build empires by taking 1 step forward and 2 steps back.
IBM said:"Whose" is the abbreviation of "who has", not "who is" you dickwit.
Sorry, but whose is in fact correct.
You just got schooled by Bunniesman, no?
Wrong. Who's means who is or who has. Whose is possessive.