Yes and no. That picture is the one-off members jersey, but it without the member names on it, it is the 2011 Sharks alternate jersey.I'm guessing that's a one-off members jersey.
I see the blue line merging in to the same coloured tear drop now... My bad.No, it's not. And your attempts at shutting me down because you think you're right are hilarious.
Yes and no. That picture is the one-off members jersey, but it without the member names on it, it is the 2011 Sharks alternate jersey.
By becoming a 2011 Cronulla Sharks Member your name will be embedded into the Jersey worn by the Sharks in our first home game of the season against the Dragons!
Where does it say that this is going to be used as their alternate jersey Timmah? You seem pretty sure but I cant find 1 single statement confirming this
All I could find is this, saying that it will be worn in Rd1 but thats it
http://www.sharks.com.au/default.aspx?s=membership-membersjersey
Completely agree it's ineffective. The whole concept of the teardrop is, IMO.I see the blue line merging in to the same coloured tear drop now... My bad.
I might add having the tear drop merging in to a straight line is pretty ineffective - can barely tell the tear drop is there...
Spot on - previous literature had the members jersey being the alternative plus names, which obviously isn't the case anymore.Timmah is probably a tad confused because initially the announcement was the members jersey was going to be the brand new alternative strip.. As I believe this is the predominantly black jersey - they realised they would have problems with the names on the jersey.
So now it says "brand new designed members jersey" on the site.
http://www.sharks.com.au/default.aspx?s=membership-membersjersey