t-ba
Post Whore
- Messages
- 59,690
cunspirassy?
Needs more K where the C would be and there's no way there'd be a Y at the end...too much respect for spelling conventions I'm afraid.
Congrats.
cunspirassy?
Fitzgibbon played more of a part than Pearce.
Scooting from DH on the 4th, GF winning halfback.
Sod this 'out of the hands crap just call a ball forward if it travels forward...
My overall impression was that the Roosters got a better deal with some of the calls, but also that Manly got away with quite a lot in the tackle.
There's also a delightful irony in people shrieking about all the media attention SBW gets but then picking over every little thing he does looking for things to bag him about. And while he had a relatively shocking first half, he made up for it with two plays which undoubtedly changed the game. Much like the Stewart brothers last week, who started the game like they were deliberately trying to lose but then came right and bossed it.
Who's dick is this guy sucking fmd
He was good in the finals series but was hardly motm in this game
You do realise if every ball that travelled forward was called as forward that players wouldn't be able to throw passes while moving, because just about all of them travel forward?
It would change the dynamics of the game completely. Effectively you'd have everyone standing still, it would be like crossing rugby league with netball.
Some of you are complete morons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=box08lq9ylg
IF there was a controversial call in the game, and there really wasn't, it would be the penalty try for Lyon, who in fairness milked the situation.
Nothing controversial about any of the passes leading to Roosters try's, unless you're blind or scientifically illiterate.
We've done a lot of that this year. We've shown that once we gain a bit of momentum we can post points really quick. Great game and great year. Cheers to Manly for an awesome match. Admittedly we may have gotten the rub of the green on some 50/50 calls, but credit to Manly fans for not whinging like some of the 'neutral' supporters on here..
Yeh a few dubious 50/50s, but nothing major that affected the end result.
I watched the replay last night and honestly don't think it should have been a penalty try. I believe it should have been a Manly penalty with Aubo in the sin bin.
Maloney's pass was touch and go. It looked worse as he stopped when he passed it.
Each call evened out.
The best team won the night.
The best team all year won, which is what I like to see. The new finals system at last rewards consistency for the top 4 teams.
For a team to hold 6 opposition teams scoreless, be Minor Premiers and beat their GF opponents 4 times in the same season, means there can be no doubt, the Roosters are deserved champions.
Manly were great and their GF experience showed.
A truly great GF!
Penalty roosters for JWH headbutt
Jorge Taufua didn't play at it
Early knock on called knock back
7-2 penalty count for as the worst offending team of the year
Roosters were the best team of the year but not on the night and still got the result, they deserved the premiers tag,but Manly deserved a fair set of officials which was not forthcoming
Hopefully we get a square up (see rigged,I'm looking at you foundation clubs) premiership next year
My overall impression was that the Roosters got a better deal with some of the calls, but also that Manly got away with quite a lot in the tackle. That said, it was an excellent, tense game which i thoroughly enjoyed.
There's also a delightful irony in people shrieking about all the media attention SBW gets but then picking over every little thing he does looking for things to bag him about. And while he had a relatively shocking first half, he made up for it with two plays which undoubtedly changed the game. Much like the Stewart brothers last week, who started the game like they were deliberately trying to lose but then came right and bossed it.
Great game. Well done both teams and Congrats Roosters.