Exsilium
Coach
- Messages
- 10,349
![]()
Panthers not square at marker during Raiders field goal attempt which was charged down.
Penalty Raiders.
He is square and he's the only marker. Notice how his entire body lines up with the attacking player.
![]()
Panthers not square at marker during Raiders field goal attempt which was charged down.
Penalty Raiders.
If you think he's square then there's absolutely no problem whatsoever with Vaughan and Whitehead then. Thanks for that.He is square and he's the only marker. Notice how his entire body lines up with the attacking player.
He is square and he's the only marker. Notice how his entire body lines up with the attacking player.
Marker isn't even square. He has to line up square to where the player is standing, not the angle he is facing.Peter Wallace is a metre offside.
A wall requires two or more players the enforcer. He is also in an onside position. He is allowed to stand there.
Yup, so refs ignored a bunch of penalties that should have been given to the Raiders during both field goal attempts.Actually you are right he wasn't square by the standard the panthers fans hold.
I understand that and it's maybe something that needs to be looked at when its obvious what his reasons are for standing there with his hands down. This isn't going anywhere.
Yup, so refs ignored a bunch of penalties that should have been given to the Raiders during both field goal attempts.
Poor officiating all round, really.
Who's to say that markers may not have been square in some of the tries scored or any lead up plays that led to a try. It can go on forever.
Whitehead not square, so everything after that becomes irrelevant.
I agree.
My issue is mostly the guy in the bunker not knowing the rules rather than scouring the game for injustice. I think on balance Penrith were one point better.
Didn't realise you went back and had a second crack at this.LMFAO, that'll do me and only putting up half of my quote on the comment you used from #737 shows your desperation.
Doesn't matter whether he was involved in the play or not, a rule is a rule which you bunch of sooks have been tearing up over regarding the wall. A dummy half might want to run from there but looks up and sees the second marker almost on him because he hasn't lined up square, so he has to change his mind, so he is involving himself in the play. I just had a look at the ladder and it just has genuine points and not claytons points.
Agree, there's so much there that needs to be addressed. Would probably have fallen by the way if we had won.
Geez. I hope I never EVER see Canberra put up a wall (again) when kicking long, bombing or going for the 1 point. That would be against the rules and they never EVER would do that.