fans tune in for many reasons. Form, star players, playing style etc are much bigger drivers for neutrals.
Im not sure there'll be many tuning in for Bears over Pirates in all honesty. There is little to suggest that will be the case.
all be it old data you can see 6 of the 7 lowest rated clubs were from sydney so why would Bears be any better?
View attachment 87973
Hold on. When I said the Storm's solid ratings in Queensland and NSW are due to being camped in the top four over the bulk of their existence I was called insane by you, mongoloid and the inbred two-headed hillbilly from Cairns. For years I was told by you, mongoloid and The Great Dunce that the Storm's ratings are "proof" that a Perth-based team will have similar levels of support.
Now you're admitting it all depends on form?
So I was right when I said Perth will need to be overly successful on the field to draw similar TV ratings to the Storm?
It cost News Ltd and ARLC $100m over 20 years to make the Storm a powerhouse on the field. That and the destruction of several clubs in the 1990s.
Where is Perth going to get that sort of money to build their football department?
The Storm benefitted from the funding because most of the clubs lived hand to mouth and didn't have the resources to invest much on football operations. Many of the clubs are catching up to Melbourne due to a) the annual grant being so high and b) strong levels of state funding for high performance training centres and stadia upgrades from the NSW Gov.
Will WA Gov provide the same funding to a Perth-based team?
The irony is Cronulla will be in a stronger position on and off the field than Perth. Cronulla are now one of the more powerful clubs.