18th club, whose next?

[Dragonwest]

In this case the senior partner got the name and identity. In the Perth case the junior partner would get that.
Ask magpie fans how they feel about wests tigers, despite being the senior partner.

Lets say the Bears only have only one seat on the board. Any clause concerning name and colours would need a unanimous vote to change allowing the Bears as the junior partner to protect what they bring to the table.

 

[Iamback]

That's not how it works, and you don't need some form of legal ownership arrangements, to make it work.

Again we are talking seperate things.

to get a club and agree to send players back and forth no agreement is needed.

To have say a Perth coach in charge of the feeder - which is how you get both sides on the same page.

And if that side is going to be developing talent then you need that. That is what all the new teams need

 

[Iamback]

Lets say the Bears only have only one seat on the board. Any clause concerning name and colours would need a unanimous vote to change allowing the Bears as the junior partner to protect what they bring to the table.

Correct. There are things that can be put in place to protect sides

 

[Canard]

Again we are talking seperate things.

to get a club and agree to send players back and forth no agreement is needed.

To have say a Perth coach in charge of the feeder - which is how you get both sides on the same page.

And if that side is going to be developing talent then you need that. That is what all the new teams need

It happens now in the QCup, and yes you would have people from the club involved.

 

[Wb1234]

Pay TV doesn't care for News

Pvl won’t needlessly upset fta for no reason

 

[Canard]

Correct. There are things that can be put in place to protect sides

Be a bad idea to have any unanimous board decision arrangement.

One hostile director and the whole thing is inoperable.

 

[Wb1234]

Lets say the Bears only have only one seat on the board. Any clause concerning name and colours would need a unanimous vote to change allowing the Bears as the junior partner to protect what they bring to the table.

Likely be a joint venture given pvl has said the bears have to be involved

might be 49 percent to keep Perth happy

 

[Dragonwest]

Be a bad idea to have any unanimous board decision arrangement.

One hostile director and the whole thing is inoperable.

On any operating conditions I agree.

No issue on a set of principal non-negotiables such as name and colours that get agreed at the beginning by both parties.

 

[westerntiger]

Perth Jet Bears with the Tupolev-95 strategic bomber as its logo (its nickname is ‘Bear’)

it’s a propellor plane but who cares

 

[Iamback]

Pvl won’t needlessly upset fta for no reason

They do it on Friday night

 

[Dragonwest]

Likely be a joint venture given pvl has said the bears have to be involved

might be 49 percent to keep Perth happy

There is nothing that dictates that joint venture needs to be 50:50.

Board seats could be anything, its all part of the negotiation.

 

[Wb1234]

There is nothing that dictates that joint venture needs to be 50:50.

Board seats could be anything, its all part of the negotiation.

Yeh true it is tba

but the starting point for the bears will be 50 percent not zero

 

[Canard]

On any operating conditions I agree.

No issue on a set of principal non-negotiables such as name and colours that get agreed at the beginning by both parties.

Will Norths even entertain such a role, if they were so limited in their influence?

 

[Bukowski]

Lets say the Bears only have only one seat on the board. Any clause concerning name and colours would need a unanimous vote to change allowing the Bears as the junior partner to protect what they bring to the table.

I get what your saying. I'm saying giving the clubs identity to the junior partner is too much

 

[Jersey No 14]

This would be a fatal mistake for rugby league.
the tigers can’t get out of their own way.
Saints are making baby steps up the ladder.
knights are stagnant
Souths go down Warriors go up.
Besides skilled players are thin on the ground
And I like to see quality games.
no average one I actually turn off.
the argument is too obvious against at the moment

 

[Dragonwest]

I get what your saying. I'm saying giving the clubs identity to the junior partner is too much

If the Perth team goes down that path with the Bears, the name and colours will be the minimum requirement to come to an agreement.

I'm sure NS will wont an even share on the board, I'd doubt Perth would allow that. That what I see as the major sticking point.

I'm indifferent on teaming up with the Bears, there are some real benefits, but I'm heavily against it if Perth don't have operating control and its 50:50.

 

[blue bags]

We can't ignore the Pacific island countries. Player's. Pacifika Grizzly bears
Have games played in all Pacific island's
Junior pathway feeders for the whole NRL
Jet's from sydney.and Brisbane can get together with Perth. Perth Jet's. Both current Jet's teams as Perth jets juniors pathway feeders clubs
Could be southern Jet's. Involving Perth. Adelaide. Melbourne. Hobart. Multiple joint venture. The Balmain tiger's. Get together with Brisbane tiger's. Brisbane Bengal's
Western suburbs Magpies stand alone. South West Sydney. Campbelltown

 

[Get Rid of The Donkeys]

I agree with most of the above. Rigged probably not the term though. It implies that the process of expansion is open to the best possible bid. Whereas it looks like PNG, Perth and NZ 2 are targeted locations.

If the ARLC convinces the 17 clubs to accept Christchurch, Perth and Port Moresby then it will be a miracle. All three locations are risky propositions.

 

[Wb1234]

They do it on Friday night

So do it more lol

that’s Friday 6 pm was forced on the nrl when smith cut Monday night football and super Saturday being exclusive

If the ARLC convinces the 17 clubs to accept Christchurch, Perth and Port Moresby then it will be a miracle. All three locations are risky propositions.

walk in the park for pvl whilst he finds a cure for cancer

 

[Get Rid of The Donkeys]

Awful lot of rubbish being written here. The Storm have proven that you can build a first rate club which wins premierships and rely on feeder clubs from interstate and without a first rate local comp.
Perth’s advantages are it can learn from the mistakes made in Melbourne by focussing on pathways immediately and rely on feeder clubs in the mean time, and they have the full support of the WA government who will make this club work.
If the Storm can do it Perth definitely will.
The endless negativity here about Perth would be humorous if it wasn’t so agenda driven and pathetic.

Are you oblivious to the $75m News Ltd spent on the Storm between 1998 and 2012?

Or the $25m provided by ARLC between 2012 and 2018?

Or are you ignoring it to push a dumb agenda?

Don't forget the salary cap rort that was funded in part by News Ltd.

Do I need to remind you that News Ltd were able to do this because they held a 50% stake in the NRL?

Storm inherited the bulk of their roster from Reds and Mariners. Perth won't have any of these advantages.