1. Arlc won’t allow itHow do you stop that?
2. Other Sydney clubs won’t allow it
3. Wa govt funding to be provided under conditions like team can’t be moved
4. Perth control a majority or all of the shares
1. Arlc won’t allow itHow do you stop that?
Pasifika bears is this current bid... no perth all hypothetical talk regardless anywaysThere will be a joint venture agreement between Perth and the bears which sets out things like ownership number of games who owns brands etc etc
They wont own the licence tho, the bears will1. Arlc won’t allow it
2. Other Sydney clubs won’t allow it
3. Wa govt funding to be provided under conditions like team can’t be moved
4. Perth control a majority or all of the shares
SemanticsPasifika bears is this current bid... no perth all hypothetical talk regardless anyways
nopeThey wont own the licence tho, the bears will
Its not the same people lord... its got some relics but surely they won't be the decision makersThey couldn't even hold onto their half share of their last NRL club but they want to head up an expansion team? Theres gotta be better people to trust.
There is no perth bid, there is only the bears bid, stick to the facts, obviously the WA govt weren't interested in the bears proposalSemantics
png has a bid
Wa govt is putting its bid together now
bears could still link with Perth but unlikely
nope
ownership is for discussion
bears own the name and the colours
ownership of a new nrl team is different
the new nrl club will get a license from the beers to use their ip
bears could get 25 percent ownership and it would be fine
Bears are the only one you’ve mentioned without a bidThere is no perth bid, there is only the bears bid, stick to the facts, obviously the WA govt weren't interested in the bears proposal
THE BEARS BOARD MEMBER SAID IT. You could have stopped there!So the bears board members said it... and you believe that, but the papers confirm 60 million per year for Png and you don't believe it.... cherry pick much?
yep their insistence on holding the license has turned perth and PNG away from them, good luck with a sydney team representing pacifica North Sydney Bears fans lol.Pasifika bears is this current bid... no perth all hypothetical talk regardless anyways
“We bring to the NRL a very pragmatic model where we’re saying ‘you’ve got 17 (teams), we know you need 18, simple as that, and you need it inside the next three to four years for the next TV rights deal comes into play. We’ve said ‘we want to provide you with a solution.’Semantics
png has a bid
Wa govt is putting its bid together now
bears could still link with Perth but unlikely
nope
ownership is for discussion
bears own the name and the colours
ownership of a new nrl team is different
the new nrl club will get a license from the beers to use their ip
bears could get 25 percent ownership and it would be fine
July 2022“We bring to the NRL a very pragmatic model where we’re saying ‘you’ve got 17 (teams), we know you need 18, simple as that, and you need it inside the next three to four years for the next TV rights deal comes into play. We’ve said ‘we want to provide you with a solution.’
“We are pragmatic and we understand our place in the game. We want to be re-admitted and we’ve got these very, very small number of non-negotiables: our colours; our badge; we want somewhere between two to four games at North Sydney Oval — one of those must be against Manly — and we want that the rights of the 18th licence will always sit with the North Sydney Rugby League Football Club.
“But other than that point us in the direction and we will move.
The Bears will go anywhere for the NRL bid... but these are their ‘non-negotiables’
The Bears will go anywhere for NRL return... but these are their ‘non-negotiables’www.foxsports.com.au
And when someone from the club comes out and says that is no longer a non negotiable then I'll believe they've changed their position on arguably the most important thing to them. Until then I'll stick to what they HAVE actually said.July 2022
Recent article had their list of non negotiablesAnd when someone from the club comes out and says that is no longer a non negotiable then I'll believe they've changed their position on arguably the most important thing to them. Until then I'll stick to what they HAVE actually said.
Well it doesn't sound like these guys are any smarter. They havn't even picked an area to represent. They might need that.Its not the same people lord... its got some relics but surely they won't be the decision makers
It was a radio interview where he mentioned 3 of them, name, colours and games at NSO. There was nothing to suggest that was it, they have normally said those three things every time. It was only Moore who let slip the license ownership one in that article! He also let slip in another one about moving more games to NSO if it was financially more valuable. He isnt the brightest tool in the shed and they seem to have stopped him doing interviews lolRecent article had their list of non negotiables
Bugger me you’re a bloody clown you have had a decade to grow up, don’t waste the next decade mate.And when someone from the club comes out and says that is no longer a non negotiable then I'll believe they've changed their position on arguably the most important thing to them. Until then I'll stick to what they HAVE actually said.