Ur argument is because everything including ourselves have a limited time on earth, then rivalries are impermanent & just that reduces their importance. Very nihilistic
Interesting interpretation of what I said (incorrect by the way). You are also not addressing anything that I said.
Anyway, all I’m saying is that nothing is a constant i.e directly refuting your framing of debates via the use of words like always and other definitives.
Also, if we are going to address philosophical aspects, I didn’t say that they (rivalries) are meaningless. What I said is like everything else, its’ meaning is relative, which is by the way the complete opposite of nihilism. Meaning is a personal thing - yes it is influenced by external factors but ultimately the individual determines what is meaningful to them. It also evolves over time - I’m sure that you don’t believe or value the exact same things that you did 10, 20 years ago.