Which is why the ARLC has been reluctant to expand into Perth. The Storm were parachuted to the top of the NRL ladder from day one by News Ltd. There's nothing more that the NRL/ARLC could have done to rally the Melbourne public behind the Storm.
@Perth Red blames everything on the ARLC for not spending $3m on grassroots development, but that's a bullshit copout excuse and he knows it. Fans gravitate towards successful teams. People don't give a f**k about how many development officers are in the region. The average Broncos fan wouldn't know about development officers in Brisbane.
No club in Australian sport has been more successful than the Storm since 1998. The fact it has taken them so long to grow their fanbase, despite having everything rigged in their favour, proves it is very difficult to grow a game in a saturated market that has a cultish following for a rival competitor. All of the shit Perth Red says won't change the fact rugby league has virtually no presence in the inner suburbs of Melbourne and is only appealing to the city's Polynesian residents.
It's foolish for people to think Perth will succeed where Melbourne has failed. The game might have a larger footprint in Perth than Melbourne, but it's still a rusted on fumbleball market with two well established AwFuL. The Perth media will always provide more coverage to the Eagles and Dockers. Local businesses will throw more money at the Eagles and Dockers. The average person in Perth will never place an RL team ahead of the Eagles or Dockers.
93k packed the MCG for Origin in 1994. About one-tenth of that followed the Storm in their first 10 seasons.
The only reason Melbourne has these events is because Jeff Kennett paid a fortune for them. He did it to draw tourists to Melbourne and get one over Sydney. I fail to see how a government using major sporting events to draw money from tourism makes it the sports capial of the world. The fact it threw the Commonwealth Games under the bus has really hurt their claim to that title.