Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This dickhead thinks believes anything he reads on social media.
forums.leagueunlimited.com
Wrong.
Regions with a high proportion of Indigenous Australians overwhelmingly voted yes in the referendum – including the community where prominent no campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s family is from.
In the Northern Territory seat of Lingiari, which takes in Alice Springs and where 40% of the population is Indigenous, 58% voted against the voice and 42% voted in favour.
But 74% of the 11,000 people that live in Lingiari’s remote areas voted yes, according to figures provided by Labor MP for Lingiari, Marion Scrymgour.
The highest vote in support of yes was in Wadeye, at 92.1%. The Tiwi Islands voted 84% in favour, and Maningrida recorded an 88% yes vote.
Only one of the 20 mobile remote polling booths in the seat recorded a majority no vote.
In Yuendemu, the community home to the family of Price, shadow minister for Indigenous Australians, three in four people voted yes.
McCarthy pointed out early polling results from Queensland showed on Palm Island, where the population is 93% Indigenous, three in four voted yes.
On Mornington Island, where 77% of the population is Indigenous, McCarthy said 79% voted yes. And in Lockhart River, where almost 80% of people are Indigenous, 66% voted in favour.
Indigenous communities overwhelmingly voted yes to Australia’s voice to parliament
Polling catchments where Indigenous Australians form more than 50% of the population voted on average 63% in favour of the voicewww.theguardian.com
You proved my point, that you're the arrogant know-it-all.
www.theguardian.com
You do understand the concept of sub-populations dont you? Youve clearly been shown that the vast majority of areas with a large % of ATSI community members voted yes. But keep deluding yourself that your redneck opinions are somehow justified. Pauline would be proud of you.ACT was the only state/territory to vote in favour you obnoxious know-it-all.
ACT is Canberra plus a few small country towns.
Northern Territory, which has the highest ratio of Aborigines in the country, voted 60.5% against the proposal.
Voice referendum live results: votes count and map by state in the 2023 Australian Indigenous voice to parliament poll
Stay up to date with the latest voice referendum 2023 results from the yes and no vote count in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum. State results are based on voting data from the Australian Electoral Commission
View attachment 86150
View attachment 86151
View attachment 86152
Most Australians are like that unfortunately.
www.theguardian.com
Clearly he doesn't lol.
ACT was the only state/territory to vote in favour you obnoxious know-it-all.
ACT is Canberra plus a few small country towns.
Northern Territory, which has the highest ratio of Aborigines in the country, voted 60.5% against the proposal.
Voice referendum live results: votes count and map by state in the 2023 Australian Indigenous voice to parliament poll
Stay up to date with the latest voice referendum 2023 results from the yes and no vote count in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum. State results are based on voting data from the Australian Electoral Commission
View attachment 86150
View attachment 86151
View attachment 86152
It doesn't matter if a small community with 1,000 people voted yes. All that matters is what six states and two territories wanted. Only one jurisdiction voted "Yes", and it was one ohe whitest in the country. There's less than 9k Aborigines in ACT. Queensland has the second highest Aborigine population in Australia. Northern Territory has the highest propotion.
It does when you are making a claim that Aboriginal people didnt want this voice to justify your own racist leanings! Clearly many of them did. And you need to learn the context of equality over equity.
Jacinta Price voted "No". She's an Aborigine from the NT.
mate stop doubling down on your stupidity. Max clearly showed you some data from ATSI communities. Because one person voted one way in NT doesn't mean everyone in Canberra was wrong lol.
Do you even know what the referendum was about?
lol, now you're just deflecting after being shown to be a total dckhead, again. tell us again how Aboriginal people in NT didnt want it. The whole land tax claim was shown to be racist propaganda BS and would have needed major other laws to be passed. Im not surprised you bought it.
Again one radical persons opinion on what might have happened way into the future if he got his way, there was nothing in what was proposed that would have changed what we have now in regards land useage, tax or water (wtf?) lol.It wasn't shown to be "racist propaganda. There's a video of radical communist Thomas Mayo talking about "pay the rent" and "reparations".
Many Aborigines in Northern Territory didn't want it, FWIW. They make up 25% of the NT population. The ones who voted yes are communists like Thomas Mayo who believe non-indigenous Australians should "pay the rent".
Voice to Parliament architect addresses plan to 'pay the rent'
One of the architects of the Voice to Parliament has spoken about the proposal being the 'first step' towards reparations in unearthed video footage.www.dailymail.co.uk
www.rmit.edu.au
Again one radical persons opinion on what might have happened way into the future if he got his way, there was nothing in what was proposed that would have changed what we have now in regards land useage, tax or water (wtf?) lol.
I'd suggest you turn Sky news off.
No, the Voice referendum will not end private land ownership in Australia
A decades-old claim alleging that private land ownership is under threat from native title has resurfaced ahead of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice referendum.
haha, not that it had anything at all to do with what was proposed in the constitutional change, do you actually know what was proposed? lol, but again a rogue bloke who was sacked the next day from his job after the ridiculous demand and the govt confirming the act was not for that purpose. Guess what, the tree planting happened and no money was exchanged! But dont let that stop your racist propaganda, Im sure you can find some other News ltd BS stories to justify your position on this. (ps the act was brought in after the wanton destruction of 46k year old Aboriginal site in the Pilbara by Rio Tinto who couldnt be held accountable as the old laws drafted in 1972 were done so to protect mining exploration of the time)
