Yes of course, no disputing that.I would take the comment about private investors with a huge grain of salt
Many nrl clubs are privately owned now
So even more reason why it might take some time then…sorry I find It hard to tell with some of your posts whether you are agreeing with me or not ?
I have said this before in respect of Team 20 …if they are not coming in until 2030 as has been suggested many times in the media … then I don’t see much point announcing them in the near future ..and then creating a long gap until they start playing in the competition…..tough ask for the new fans to get excited with that long a wait ahead of them
PNG might have a three and a half year gap between announcement and playing their first game in 2028 .. but they have plenty of stuff to get done ..
Because NRL clubs’ self interests wouldn’t come into it lol.All along I have been on ensuring the bids stand up. 2032 was always too tight a timeline.
NZ 2 makes sense for the NRL's aim but it needs to have the local RL onboard and be watertight with investment due to Warriors issues previously.
PNG the best positioned to come in as they have systems and infrastructure in place, Just need to get that to NRL standard.
The article says they are being presented to clubs. I am sure clubs will pick apart any holes in their bid.
Overall I have no issue with the process because it ensures there are no Basketcases coming in to the comp
They’ve appointed a committee of 3 nrl ceo/chairs which the nrl will discuss the tv deal and expansionBecause NRL clubs’ self interests wouldn’t come into it lol.
Have the clubs sign their new NRL agreement's and then move them aside.
So even Brisbane Tigers failed which most say is one of the bigger clubs in Brisbane with assets, pathways, a history, infrastructure and pathways but PVL said they don't want teams cannibalising other teams, so apart from moving out of their area, how is Brisabane Tigers suppose to attract new supporters being in a second tier competition?
If the ARLC doesn't want another SE QLD team at this stage it should have been spelled out and not waste those teams time and money putting a bid in.
While this might sound OTT, looks like the ARLC thought bids would just throw money at them to join but turns out that is not the case.
But we still have viable expansion options.It's insane that without Fed funding we have no viable expansion bids.
Why should that be a concern of the NRL?So even Brisbane Tigers failed which most say is one of the bigger clubs in Brisbane with assets, pathways, a history, infrastructure and pathways but PVL said they don't want teams cannibalising other teams, so apart from moving out of their area, how is Brisabane Tigers suppose to attract new supporters being in a second tier competition?
I love your outburst and crying as much as PR’s.If the ARLC doesn't want another SE QLD team at this stage it should have been spelled out and not waste those teams time and money putting a bid in.
While this might sound OTT, looks like the ARLC thought bids would just throw money at them to join but turns out that is not the case.
PVL fell backwards into a shit load of federal money for PNG and assumed the WA govt and NZ govt would be just as stupid.So even Brisbane Tigers failed which most say is one of the bigger clubs in Brisbane with assets, pathways, a history, infrastructure and pathways but PVL said they don't want teams cannibalising other teams, so apart from moving out of their area, how is Brisabane Tigers suppose to attract new supporters being in a second tier competition?
If the ARLC doesn't want another SE QLD team at this stage it should have been spelled out and not waste those teams time and money putting a bid in.
While this might sound OTT, looks like the ARLC thought bids would just throw money at them to join but turns out that is not the case.
I don’t think NZ Gov was ever properly engaged however WA Gov are being engaged and if it goes ahead they will fork out cash.PVL fell backwards into a shit load of federal money for PNG and assumed the WA govt and NZ govt would be just as stupid.
Because NRL clubs’ self interests wouldn’t come into it lol.
Have the clubs sign their new NRL agreement's and then move them aside.
It’s always been seen as WA and PNG for 18/19 with team 20 tbd. These other recently failed bids were always vying for that 20th spot. But you can’t go to 20 until 18 and 19 are sorted and commercially sound.Yep, the cultists don't want to admit it, but this has been a poorly thought out and run process.
All of these reasons to reject bids would, or should, have been known from the start. The requirement for a licence fee and govt support, and not wanting another team in Brisbane shouldn't have come as a surprise to teams at the end of the process, it should have been known from the start so as not to waste bidders' time and money.
The only result of this is going to be to scare away future potential bidders as you never know if they'll just move the goalposts at the end of the process.
Funding model has changed since thenOf course NRL clubs are a huge part of it but to be fair
Warriors and GC had issues. Storm had to rely on an increased funding to survive early on.
So I get why they have a high bar for the new teams.
Given other sports failures not just RL, it isn't a bad thing
Funding model has changed since then
Grant used to be 1.5 million less than the cap
Now it’s five million over the cap
Who’s fronting up the $40-50mill for a hq, offices and centre of excellence?They don’t need it
Govt has already built them a brand new stadium
Plus Forsyth Barr in Dunedin as a secondary stadium
Don’t need money to invest in juniors either as the game has its own plus raiding union juniors will be easy for a Christchurch team
Even with 200 million spent on it hbf park will be nowhere near as good as the stadium in Christchurch
Maybe the nrl doubling their $20mill grants will help?NRL pays for the opposition but it is one of the issues with State Based lower grades. NSWRL competitions have no money for this.
QRL isn't much better yet both fight to have it under 1 organisation
The Warriors was 30 years ago, the Titans almost 20.Of course NRL clubs are a huge part of it but to be fair
Warriors and GC had issues. Storm had to rely on an increased funding to survive early on.
So I get why they have a high bar for the new teams.
Given other sports failures not just RL, it isn't a bad thing
We do, well we did until the nrl decided to add a $20mill extra on to the ‘business plan’ requirement.It's insane that without Fed funding we have no viable expansion bids.