1st T20I - Australia v England Adelaide Oval Jan 12

[El Diablo]

did you not read my post comparing Lee and Nannes and your claim about stats :?

 

[Big Pete]

You editted your post, it originally said Smith.

EDIT: :lol: you just changed your entire post around, don't play the confused card, you know what you originally wrote made little sense.

 

[El Diablo]

you posted 5 mins after my last edit :crazy:

my first post also was nearly identical except for one line

 

[Big Pete]

I had it in advanced post and was looking up stats. on O'Keefe, Smith, Lee, Tait, Johnson and Nannes I wasn't aware of the edit because it wasn't apparent on my browser.

:lol: identicle? Except the point was you were comparing Smith to Nannes and only made one argument for Lee, the rest was all Smith.

Point is, Nannes is a better T20 bowler than Lee and we could have used him. I don't understand why you were trying to belittle CS point when stats. back Nannes up.

 

[El Diablo]

I had it in advanced post and was looking up stats. on O'Keefe, Smith, Lee, Tait, Johnson and Nannes I wasn't aware of the edit because it wasn't apparent on my browser.

:lol: identicle? Except the point was you were comparing Smith to Nannes and only made one argument for Lee, the rest was all Smith.

Point is, Nannes is a better T20 bowler than Lee and we could have used him. I don't understand why you were trying to belittle CS point when stats. back Nannes up.

are you f**king stupid or what :?

i compared their batting averages, bowling averages and their bowling economy rates

i'll post them again

Nannes and Lee are pretty much equal in RPO conceeded. 7.02 v 7.12

Nannes has a better strike rate but Lee has a much better batting average. bowling 19.82 v 27.69 and batting 8.4 v 19.16

what more do you want?

 

[Big Pete]

are you f**king stupid or what :?

If I was you'd hardly be the right person to judge, you're bringing up batting statistics when we're talking primarily about bowling!

All your stats. support Nannes is a better T20 bowler than Lee.

So thank you for illustrating my point.

 

[El Diablo]

obviiously there is Victorian blood running through your veins if you think that

 

[Big Pete]

bowling 19.82 v 27.69

So which bowling stats. are better El D? The 19.82 or the 27.69?

 

[El Diablo]

and you conveniently leave out the batting averages because it doesn't suit you and more than evens it out

you were talking about stats

when they are brought up you suddenly don't wish to use them all

 

[Big Pete]

No, I was mystified because of this exchange...

Still trying to figure out how Lee is a better T20 bowler than Nannes.

Victorian alert

Note CS doesn't say 'player' he says 'bowler' hence batting statistics don't come into that particular argument.

 

[El Diablo]

he'll say anything

he's a Victorian ffs