- Messages
- 154,227
the top 6 could be worse.Our top 6 is still f**ked. They've literally got every part of it wrong. At least 3 of them shouldn't be there and the other 3 are batting in the wrong spots.
Wagging tails keep papering over the cracks.
Unlike some I won't call for anyone to get dropped while we still have a mathematical chance of winning but if we are 2-0 or 3-0 after 3 changes have to be made.
It's the courier Fail what else do you expect????Can't believe all the hate for Stuart broad just for not walking lol growing up I was always taught to wait till the umpire gives u out. Plenty of Aussies have not walked in the past.
Also I think the courier mail is starting to embarrass themselves with all "unnamed English medium pacer" talk and so on.
Can't believe all the hate for Stuart broad just for not walking lol growing up I was always taught to wait till the umpire gives u out. Plenty of Aussies have not walked in the past.
Also I think the courier mail is starting to embarrass themselves with all "unnamed English medium pacer" talk and so on.
Yeah this was the scorecard in the paper. I didn't realise anyone actually cared
![]()
Any batsman that walks is an idiot IMO. If the umpire incorrectly gives you out you can't stay so why walk if they give you not out?
Typical of the stupidity you see from the Courier Fail.Yeah this was the scorecard in the paper. I didn't realise anyone actually cared
![]()
Any batsman that walks is an idiot IMO. If the umpire incorrectly gives you out you can't stay so why walk if they give you not out?
f**king media piss me off
apparently the Ashes are over now because we were shit on day 1
and apparently Clarke has to move back to No 5 and they rattle off all these stats on how many runs he has made at 4 and how many he has made at 5
fmd,
do they really think Broad is gonna come out and bowl crap at Clarke just because he is batting at 5 instead of 4 ?
Even England were struggling on Day 1 in 2010 and look what happened.
Not saying we could still win the series but thats the thing about test matches, things can change based on the conditions.
As for Clarke moving to 5, he can bat wherever he wants to bat, they seem to base everything on stats. He bats so well at 5, and they say "Oh he should bat at number 3 or 4" but if he fails at No 4, "Oh he should move back to 5".
Even England were struggling on Day 1 in 2010 and look what happened.
Not saying we could still win the series but thats the thing about test matches, things can change based on the conditions.
As for Clarke moving to 5, he can bat wherever he wants to bat, they seem to base everything on stats. He bats so well at 5, and they say "Oh he should bat at number 3 or 4" but if he fails at No 4, "Oh he should move back to 5".
The could have at least called him Stuartini, or "the guy that looks like Ellyse Perry".Typical of the stupidity you see from the Courier Fail.
Thanks got your input Ian Chappell.Clarke should bat at 3. f**k the stats. He should be mentally strong enough and he should take the responsibility of batting at 3.