Hugh Trumble and Ashley Mallet say hello.Lol no.
Because he's out best ever offie
That can't be right. I saw Australia lose something like 7/1 when Sarfraz Nawaz took 9 wickets in 79 in Perth.
Edit: Sarfraz took 7/1 as Australia lost 7/5 and it was Melbourne. Perth was the nasty handled the ball and mankad incidents.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63235.html
Fair comparison IMO, both have talent and both have the concentration of a gold fish.Duminy just received the ultimate insult: compared to Smarsh.
One is a successful test player, the other has a famous relative who wasFair comparison IMO, both have talent and both have the concentration of a gold fish.
One is a successful test player, the other has a famous relative who was
Now you've got me, one is a successful test player? Really? FMD, I just don't know which oneOne is a successful test player, the other has a famous relative who was
I don't think there is an abundance of obvious young talent to take Mitch Marsh's spot so I would even consider a guy like Klinger. He is a few years past his best shield form, but these old guys come in with very little pressure and a lot of perspective and motivation with a late opportunity to live the dream and they over achieve (Rogers, Voges etc). We could get a season or two out of a guy like that and he would add some leadership.
Or you could pick a younger player with a future, like say Maddinson... or bring back Burns (and play Smarsh at 6) or even someone like Ferguson who is in form, and still young enough to have a few years