1st Test: South Africa v Australia at Cape Town Nov 9-13, 2011

[lockyno1]

This is what happens when you have 2-3 overrated hacks in the batting lineup- Haddin, Ponting and Hughes.

 

[hineyrulz]

I can't wait for the day when our team isn't infested by Nuffies like Shitchell and Shitchell :crazy:

 

[lockyno1]

Now tell me why we left Copeland out for 3 lemons...and a bad version of Hauritz spinner in Lyon!

 

[Tonearm Terrorwrist]

This is what happens when you have 2-3 overrated hacks in the batting lineup- Haddin, Ponting and Hughes.

If we left it up to you we'd have circus poofs and beach bums in the team

 

[lockyno1]

If we left it up to you we'd have circus poofs and beach bums in the team

Pity our best bowler has been Watson who I love to bits!

 

[hineyrulz]

Now tell me why we left Copeland out for 3 lemons...and a bad version of Hauritz spinner in Lyon!

Shitchell is one of your bum boys.

 

[dogslife]

Instead we get the absolute steaming pile of horse shit Johnson

So basically your everyday Mitchell Johnson. Greatest thing the selectors ever did was leave the nuffie out of the side, they should seriously just consider picking him as a Perth mercenary and give him the rest of the year off

 

[dogslife]

Pity our best bowler has been Watson who I love to bits!

Not sure if it's been mentioned but your banner is horrendously outdated :?

 

[lockyno1]

Shitchell is one of your bum boys.

When have I loved Johnson? I have always said we can afford to punt on him if the other bowlers are right. It is a horrible lineup

Lyon- a spinner that can't spin it...is he better than Hauritz? Hauritz can bat!

Siddle- A seam bowler on a swingers wicket, dumb

Harris- generally a seam bowler

Johnson- lets be honest just a flat out quick bowler, he doesn't seam or swing the ball

Watson- the only decent bowler in there

Yet we leave out Pattinson (the better Victorian), Cummins (better version of Johnson), and Copeland (the better version of Siddle)

:crazy:

 

[BunniesMan]

For the next test we need to shove Watson down the order and replace all our bowlers with...anyone.

 

[hineyrulz]

When have I loved Johnson? I have always said we can afford to punt on him if the other bowlers are right. It is a horrible lineup

Lyon- a spinner that can't spin it...is he better than Hauritz? Hauritz can bat!

Siddle- A seam bowler on a swingers wicket, dumb

Harris- generally a seam bowler

Johnson- lets be honest just a flat out quick bowler, he doesn't seam or swing the ball

Watson- the only decent bowler in there

Yet we leave out Pattinson (the better Victorian), Cummins (better version of Johnson), and Copeland (the better version of Siddle)

:crazy:

:lol: you used to flog over him almost as much as Sunshine, Clarke get this tatooed fairy off ASAP.

 

[lockyno1]

You do know that was when he was still picking wickets up? Believe me my attack would be

Watson (AR)
Hauritz or Cullen Bailey
Copeland
Cummins
Harris

 

[hineyrulz]

The wicket doesn't look to bad, fmd that was the worst batting performance of all time.

 

[hineyrulz]

Hussey drops a sitter FFS!!

 

[dogslife]

For the next test we need to shove Watson down the order and replace all our bowlers with...anyone.

I took a hat-trick once in grade 6... I feel over qualified for the job

 

[madunit]

I for one am f**king happy to see a wicket favouring bowlers. That sort of thing died in the late 90's. I want to see more of it. International crickets obsession with batting friendly decks is f**ked.

The fact players like Watson, Clarke, Graeme Smith, any of the pom batsmen etc all average in the mid to high 40's is a f**king joke.

 

[Raiders_Premiers]

yet Clarke went out and made 150 on the deck

dickhead

 

[Evenflow]

Hughes made a century 1 test ago and people are calling for his head...fmd. Steve Waugh would never have had a career if some of you blokes were selectors back in the 80s.

Big f**king deal, it was his only century (or 50 for that matter) is his last 20 digs and for an opener it's just not good enough. In those last 20 he's averaged a grand total of 28 which is just plain shit no matter what way you want to spin it. Li=ucky for him he scored that 50 and 100 or it'd make for even more pathetic reading.

If he was a "Victorian" the usual suspects would've been calling for his head ages ago yet there's still the deluded halfwits like you that defend this obvious dud and the sooner he goes back to shield to learn a bit of technique the better. Have a look as his chart below if you want further proof of how much of a dud he is.

 

[African Monkey]

Reading praise for South Africa is sickening.

It'll make the choke all the more better

 

[madunit]

yet Clarke went out and made 150 on the deck

dickhead

How did he go in the 2nd innings?

By your logic, gillespie would be one of our best batsnen because he scored a double ton.

Dickhead