Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Australia dear boy, Australia.
And this proves what? Did you win a flag for repeating this over and over again?
I'll get the crayons out just for you.
And this relates to the thread topic how?
I don't think it's fair to compare the 2 codes TV deals.
Crayon time again,
Its not just tv deals. The revenue gap last year, when the tv deals were not that far apart was $300million. Metro matters clearly.
Agreed, metro audiences are where the moneys at
And this has what to do with the thread topic. It's just an afl fan, possibly with a brain injury of some description, mindlessly talking about afl and metros.
What has a discussion about the value of metro markets got to do with a thread talking about expanding the comp to 20 clubs and who that might include? You really cant see the relevance? Critical analysis not a skill then? Bless.
Bless yourself. You have just used this as an excuse to once again promote afl to the detriment of rugby league. It's got nothing to do with metros, its all to do with you spamming the forum with the same old broken record afl bullshit.
I think the NRL deal being as close as it is to the AFL is pretty remarkable.
And ch9 paid so much for it ........
And how much did they pay for the dolphins?
Your analysis is sound. That said the NRL could literally introduce an extra five minutes of half time and I doubt people would take up arms. However, it’s only beneficial to FTA revenue. It’s moot for ad-free subscription services. And that’s where a lot of NRL viewers are now watching.
I'd actually prefer this, bit longer to queue for a beer and a piss at the stadium
