How does the home crowd average get sorted out for the double header? I was at the game last year, and about half left after the broncs. Do the bulldogs get attributed the whole crowd? Or a percentage?
How does the home crowd average get sorted out for the double header? I was at the game last year, and about half left after the broncs. Do the bulldogs get attributed the whole crowd? Or a percentage?
The simplicity of some people thinking it's the way to go to just "cull Sydney teams" is alarming. Cutting off the nose to spite the face sort of stuff - you would lose so many fans to the game, many of them forever. Ridiculous. I'm not a traditionalist by any means but I can't see people supporting merged clubs a great rate, it's taken most of a ten-year period to get Saints and WT's right, and we all saw the failure NE was.
I think it would be more likely to be what Tim said. Broncos v Titans would achieve much more than 25,000 k alone.
10.5k at EAS and DFS would be higher outside origin with star players available.
Correct. I'm tired pointing out that Origin is a nuisance. It is a meaningless series of exhibitions which negatively impacts on the heart ot the NRL season robbing clubs of tens of thousdands of paying customers and robbing games of athmosphere and robbing the competition of status.
If we must have it limit it to home and away. 2 matches in 8 days and have done with it. Having the three sprawl across the mid season is nonsense but this is League so nonsense prevails.
(exclusing 1997 for obvious reasons)
Super League, Mariners etc would've seen a lot of people disillusioned with RL I imagine.Did the Knights have a lot of low crowds in '97?
I wonder will Storm fans continue to show up given the beating handed to them on MNF, although the stars returning might help?