KeepingTheFaith
Referee
- Messages
- 25,235
We'll be back next year hopefully
This is what bothers me. Off season officially begins. f**k.
We'll be back next year hopefully
The thing about Rose was that it was very deliberate . He missed the tackle then chased him down and smacked him in the face with the elbow . 6 weeks if the NRL are actually serious .I think big georgey lost a few fans Tonight .
Just dissapointed we didn't get a 100% fair go, is all.
Actually, I was doing nothing of the sort - I was simply commenting on your obviously ill-chosen reference to scientific theory to justify your own anger at your side's loss. The Butterfly Effect states that repercussions from single events are ultimately unknowable - that was my point. Using it to point towards a single possible permutation contradicts one of the theory's primary tenets - i.e: knowing is plain impossible.
As for the rest of your post - you think that, if it makes you feel better. It's a fairly pointless aspect of enquiry, as far as I'm concerned. The team I wanted to win, lost.
This is what bothers me. Off season officially begins. f**k.
I was objecting to your choice of wording, not the theories themselves - I've stated this once already. You can't use the 'Butterfly effect' theory to justify a counterfactual postulation - that's not what the theory means. I've no real interest in the hypothesising otherwise - like I said, I wanted the Warriors to win, and they didn't. It doesn't really make me feel any better arguing that they -could- have. They didn't.I didn't say I knew, I didn't even imply it. I threw out possibilities, very valid possibilities. Yet you want to engage in fallacy and attempt to reduce my argument to the absurd, by throwing out wild suggestions that while theoretically possible are rather stupid and unlikely.
What next, are you going to argue we can't guess what the weather might be next Saturday? There's a difference between knowing and theorising - you're obviously smart enough to know this.
Give it up mate.
I just hope the transition goes smoothly. Would hate to see a bumpy transition as we so clearly have the talent to be title contenders for the near future.
at the end of the day, better manly than the cheats anyway.
I was objecting to your choice of wording, not the theories themselves - I've stated this once already. You can't use the 'Butterfly effect' theory to justify a counterfactual postulation - that's not what the theory means. I've no real interest in the hypothesising otherwise - like I said, I wanted the Warriors to win, and they didn't. It doesn't really make me feel any better arguing that they -could- have. They didn't.
Are warriors fans/bandwagons seriously having a sook about the refs? FMD the only reason they were even in the grand final was because of the inept performance of the very same refs the week before. :lol:
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
If anyone is wondering why Manly fans are universally despised, I present to you Exhibit A.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
If anyone is wondering why Manly fans are universally despised, I present to you Exhibit A.
Perhaps you write them a letter on the correct etiquette for things such as this.There's a time and place for everything - even apologies. That was neither the time nor the place.
Perhaps you write them a letter on the correct etiquette for things such as this.