2011 Jersey & Sponsorship Discussion

[applesauce]

Poor Rusty... perhaps he didn't give Bon Jovi a good enough BJ...

:lol:

As funny as that is. Was that on the DT website for 2days?

 

[BunniesMan]

Does not sound gay at all. :roll::roll::roll:

I meant the logo! It's good that it's see through because it makes it less in the way. Not the jersey itself. I'm not gay.

 

[thorson1987]

I meant the logo! It's good that it's see through because it makes it less in the way. Not the jersey itself. I'm not gay.

You keep telling yourself that.

 

[BunniesMan]

You keep telling yourself that.

I will thanks. And I'll tell my gf too.

 

[Flapper]

I'll be sure to tell her too.

 

[dgsfan]

Haha. That made me laugh.

Tigers jersey is the absolute worst... scrap that, Knights jersey is... I can't decide now. Both utter sh*t and I hope no one buys them to send a msg to their teams.

 

[Rapture_Shark]

i think that there may be the gold strips around the red cos i dunno if its me but i can kinda see it

 

[Smiley]

Why don't they have Star City written under the logo?

I had no idea who Star City was till the south announcement and I'd say many of general public will have no idea who their sponsor is next year.

In Brisbane anyway.

 

[BunniesMan]

Why don't they have Star City written under the logo?

I had no idea who Star City was till the south announcement and I'd say many of general public will have no idea who their sponsor is next year.

In Brisbane anyway.

That's what a club should do. Negotiate to get as much money as possible while giving away the least amount of jersey space. Not like some of the shockers I've seen on some jerseys.

 

[Dragon Dave]

It may be good integration colour wise but it takes up a good chunk of the jersey. No ISC logo either?

 

[BunniesMan]

It may be good integration colour wise but it takes up a good chunk of the jersey. No ISC logo either?

I suppose that's where the tradeoff came.

 

[Flapper]

it's a good payoff for Souths if they got a big chunk of cash for just a star on the front, that no one outside of Sydney will recognise.

 

[hellteam]

My immediate thought when I saw that star logo was for Underwater World at Mooloolaba. I had no idea what that logo is

sh*t idea by Star City

 

[Desert Qlder]

Why don't they have Star City written under the logo?

I had no idea who Star City was till the south announcement and I'd say many of general public will have no idea who their sponsor is next year.

In Brisbane anyway.

Some would argue then that the sponsoship has been effective for Star City.

 

[King Tigerman]

My immediate thought when I saw that star logo was for Underwater World at Mooloolaba. I had no idea what that logo is

sh*t idea by Star City

exactly its a stupid idea for them because the casino should be neutral , star city should only sponsor single teams in national leagues give their sponsorship money to some1 like the sydney kings or to some 1 who would have their players show up at the casino after games

 

[Timmah]

I think people are suggesting the logo placement without the name "Star City" actually being on the jersey is the silly part/sh*t idea.

 

[Russell Crowe's Band]

its fine

maybe look better in white but whatever.

 

[dgsfan]

I think people are suggesting the logo placement without the name "Star City" actually being on the jersey is the silly part/sh*t idea.

sh*t for who? Star City? Probably. Souths? No. What's you're point? Are you siding with sponsors? Pathetic.

Good on Souths.

 

[Flapper]

sh*t for who? Star City? Probably. Souths? No. What's you're point? Are you siding with sponsors? Pathetic.

Good on Souths.

He's not siding with anyone, he's just pointing out what we're saying. Which is Star City are idiots for not at least including the words "Star City" in their sponsorship deal. Good on Souths indeed, we can all agree there.

 

[thorson1987]

its fine

maybe look better in white but whatever.

+1