You can, but it doesn't pay.
Its better to master the wrestle techniques like Storm, Cowboys 15, Rabbitohs 14.
The rabbits were the 3rd best attacking team that year and in their 3 finals appearances scored 40, 32 and 30 points. The cowboys were the 2nd best attacking team in the comp and in the finals scored 12, 39, 32 and 17 points.
How on earth can you use those 2 teams winning as examples that only the best wrestling teams win? In both those years the best wrestling teams lost and the teams that won were arguably the most exciting in the comp.
Even this year it's a stretch to just call the sharks the best wrestlers. They have played plenty of good attacking football. Sure the raiders didn't win, they haven't quite gelled yet and had injuries to key players (even if they managed to play). Still they were probably the better team against the storm and sharks and just couldn't quite get the job down.
Beyond that yet again you've taken one overly simplistic stat and attempted to paint a far to broad picture using a very narrow analysis. Why hasn't this supposed drop in point scoring affected tv ratings? If anything you would expect to see more of an impact there but we haven't. Why have SOO crowds done so well in that same time frame with no points scored? It's a far more complex issue than that and i feel extremely confident that a slight drop in points per game isn't the answer. Maybe i'll make a more complex post on the matter later on but f**k it i'm going to enjoy my day off now instead.