This is something I mocked up several years ago. I'm not sure why I gave it the 'Sydney City' name, but I'm thinking it was because I am one who much prefers to call teams by their location (ie: who they are supposed to represent) instead of a nickname, and I don't hear anyone calling the Sydney Roosters 'Sydney' ... but 'Sydney City' does have a more iconic ring to it and helps it stand out from South Sydney and the various other Sydney-based teams in other sports.
![]()
There are two logos represented in this one. The obvious one is the old Eastern Suburbs one, but with the head of the chook being the current one, and with a more modern 'Roosters' text.
This had me thinking.
Why the f**k are they called "Sydney"
Schwing
![]()
My best guess would have to be that when Souths got excluded from the comp in 2000, they assumed we wouldn't be back and thought they could take over the entire eastern sector of Sydney, much like the territory of the Swans or Sydney FC.
I've been a big supporter of changing the name back to Easts.
still just a name same teamWe changed to Sydney City in 1995 to supposedely broaden our appeal. Dogs did the same. In 2000 we dropped the City bit. Nothing to do with Souths.
I agree with you. I don't like the name and think we should revert to Eastern Suburbs and bring back the old logo. That's who we are. Souths and Dogs have both shown that their fans connect with their traditional names and logos.
LMAO
![]()