And if the TV grant was $10mill but your fanbase was three times the size? You'd be much better off than you are now! Losing Thursday night and Fri night isnt going to drop the TV grant hugely, by some yes, but that some should be more than made up for if we could double our triple our fanbase.
Like we keep saying bigger TV deals are better for NRLHQ, bigger fanbases are better for clubs. Somehow we need to find a better balance, like AFL.
Hypothetical.None of the Sydney clubs would be able to treble their attendances.You'd need a 40,000 stadium for the Sharks for a start.
I'd say losing Thursday and Friday night would impact the grant, more than you would imagine.6 pm perhaps would have little impact ,but not Friday 8pm .
The more live apps for live sport such as the NRL via Telstra ,the bigger the impact on FTA and Pay TV's bidding price.
If clubs could (in a dreamworld )average 30,000,and have memberships of 40,000 plus, they'd be in the position of the likes of the Broncos,and the need for larger grants from the NRL HO would be greatly reduced.
Another problem we have, every time a player or players stuffs upland the media pushes the crisis buttons, the chances of getting more sponsors on board is that much harder for clubs.
We'd be in deep sh*t if the grants were not forthcoming,and having to rely on current crowds.
You continue to compare us with AFL on the matter.It's chalk and cheese with regards fan base, memberships,and dominance in their respective heartland markets.
I suspect when the WSS stadium is up and running crowds will take a decent jump,SFS will have increases,ANZ should have smaller increases due to isolation from main fan bases.That's why ANZ should be used for major NRL games such as Souths v Parra.Bulldogs v Parra.
The sooner TV income is used solely for H/O ,such as expansion,infrastrucure and grassroots, and NRL clubs are self sufficient can't come sooner for me.