oh dont get me wrong there disgusting and sometimes wrong, but they're half the price and kids/bogans dont careThe best and less jerseys have always looked dog awful.
Dont know why anybody likes them.
terry hill era was the bestThis is their 18th season in the NRL?
When I think of the Wests Tigers jersey there still isn't an iconic look that comes to mind.
The best and less jerseys have always looked dog awful.
Dont know why anybody likes them.
The best and less jerseys have always looked dog awful.
Dont know why anybody likes them.
All im saying is that, as a new startup sport, they don't have the luxury to steer too far away from the teams that currently exist. Even established female sports like soccer (W League) and cricket (WBBL) "shackle the women to the men". I don't want to go watch the Manly Mermaids playing in sky blue...it just won't work...include them as part of the Sea Eagles in maroon and white and I have an instant connection and 71 years of history. In fact I find it disrespectful when I see the Jilaroos in a yellow jersey. Why shouldn't they have the same jersey as the Kangaroos like The Southern Stars and Matildas do.
Oh for a kid. 100% i would be getting the best and less version.I get them for the kid.
Cheap
No sponsorship
They can treat it like shit
Cheaper to replace once they grow out of them
100% sublimated
Consistent sizing!!!!
This is how it's done
View attachment 18538
As are on field jerseys.100% sublimated
As are on field jerseys.
It’s weird that we can only buy embroidered jerseys but the onfields are subd and this is also cheaper than embroidering...
Apart from no sponsors, best and less are actually closer to on field jersey than Rebel Sport...?
I respect your point of view...but not once have I ever said that these games should be curtain raiser "under cards" to NRL games. They must exist on their own.And that there hits exactly on what the NRL should be avoiding at all cost!
The NRL shouldn't be setting up the WNRL to appeal to us in the hopes that we'll show up early on game day to watch it before the real game comes on, the NRL's already got us, we're already paying customers, they should be setting it up to appeal to a new audience as much as possible, using it to appeal to people that wouldn't normally be attracted to RL but could be interested in it in this form, and to do that it means disconnecting the WNRL from the NRL as much as possible!
Also what's more offensive? Not being able to share a jersey with the men or being indefinitely relegated to the under card with no hope of forcing your way into the main event like in those other sports? Cause frankly when you get down to it not sharing a jersey or a brand is not being able to wear a shirt and a logo, really who cares, make you're own it'll hold more meaning to you anyway, but being pegged as a less important event, an opener to the real show, means you'll never get the opportunity to make yourself the main event, you'll never be as successful as those in the more important competition and always be shackled to their success.
Though it means that their is a chance that it may fail, we need to give the WNRL the chance to grow into anything, as big as it can get, and shackling it to the NRL makes that impossible cause then it'll always be shackled to the NRL's success...
I respect your point of view...but not once have I ever said that these games should be curtain raiser "under cards" to NRL games. They must exist on their own.
From the wider shots, this Knights chooks game could have probably been better jersey contrast wise if Newy wore their blue shorts. I know its hard when their colours are exactly the same bar the shade of blue but every little bit helps
From the wider shots, this Knights chooks game could have probably been better jersey contrast wise if Newy wore their blue shorts. I know its hard when their colours are exactly the same bar the shade of blue but every little bit helps