GongPanther
Referee
- Messages
- 28,676
NFL squads have leadership groups. And on field,do we give it a second thought?
Everyone in the squad would feel comfortable confiding in at least one of these leaders. They meet once a week, issues get discussed, greivances aired, problems sorted, the rot doesn't set in.
Its a big wank on the surface but if it works for the players then so be it.
Leadership group has nothing to do with the Captaincy. These are the players that have agreed to set the example for the rest of the squad.
The Captain will be named later.
I disagree. I think the more leadership the better. It’s not 6 captains like everyone seems to think it is, it’s a leadership group to guide the younger boys on AND off the field
Leadership groups are common place. Storm had a 6 man leadership group last year also.
https://www.melbournestorm.com.au/news/2018/03/14/storm-announce-2018-leadership-group/
If we name 6 co-captains stick the boot in. But this is not some ridiculous unprecedented move.
NFL squads have leadership groups. And on field,do we give it a second thought?
People are sticking the boot in because that’s how it worked at the Tigers, 6 captains.
That is the main thing. Still can't have 6 guys talking to the ref so need a gameday captain still
If he’s doing the same thing as he did at the tigers it is 6 captains.
That’s not how it worked at the Tigers. There was no clear captain.
He’s said he is naming a captain.
That's a sweeping statement and one I don't agree with. My experience with young men is that the more leaders they have that can inspire them and give them examples of how to behave, the better. Why is it everybody wants a demi-god leadership model? Leaders are pilloried for having assistants and seeking help from consultants, but no one individual can possibly have all the answers and the best leaders know that and get help whenever possible. Why not a group of inspired individuals all contributing and helping the larger group achieve their goals? The captain has the final call, but he will be stronger and better for having that group to help him.Young men need a clear leader, not a committee.
That's a sweeping statement and one I don't agree with. My experience with young men is that the more leaders they have that can inspire them and give them examples of how to behave, the better. Why is it everybody wants a demi-god leadership model? Leaders are pilloried for having assistants and seeking help from consultants, but no one individual can possibly have all the answers and the best leaders know that and get help whenever possible. Why not a group of inspired individuals all contributing and helping the larger group achieve their goals? The captain has the final call, but he will be stronger and better for having that group to help him.
I think young players will look up to that group. I would hope that a young player would aspire to be in the leadership group because they see that group made up of players with great leadership qualities. It is a sign of recognition of your behaviour and qualities as a player, on and off the field.
That said, I understand where you are coming from about committees, a Camel was after all, a horse designed by a committee, but don't confuse authority with leadership. As long as it's clear who makes the decisions on the field when somebody has to make a call, then having a leadership group is not a problem and a good captain will use them to help the team improve.
Even if we had 6 captains. It's better than being captained by Fraudner.