mn_tibor
Juniors
- Messages
- 226
Agree it looks great but it is very similar to the Broncos 2018 ANZAC jersey
Agree it looks great but it is very similar to the Broncos 2018 ANZAC jersey
Not only is there plenty of navy teams in the NRL, one of them is in the same state as the Titans.Titans fans are overall furious at this years home jersey, the colour defies logic. We love the light blue, gold and white that symbolises the beaches. The club also has to get over trying to put helmets and other garbage on the jersey.
Not only is there plenty of navy teams in the NRL, one of them is in the same state as the Titans.
Why have the cammo and the soldiers... Less is more. I think the subtlety of just the camouflage alone with no soldiers would have been enough on this this classic roosters design. I also think more people would be willing to purchase it if it didn't have the soldiers on it.
I know it's only "based on" the super league design but surely they could have had a red collar and sleeve trim without Nike sueing themWith both their home (blue) and away (black) jerseys deemed to clash with the Wests Tigers' home kit, the Warriors will wear their alternate jersey on Sunday "The Little General".
https://shop.warriorsstore.co.nz/2019-vodafone-warriors-ccc-the-little-general-jersey-adults/
It's a tribute to Stacey Jones' 1997 season.
Is this officially our first Super League heritage jersey? I know Brisbane had one a couple of years back but they also wore it in 1998 and said it was to celebrate the back-to-back titles.
Won their POTY award according to the link.I didn't watch the Superleague. What did Stacey Jones do that year?
Yeah it’s a pretty dodgy remake"based on"
It's probably difficult to recreate jerseys from the 90's accurately because they were baggy af whereas now jerseys are all form-fitted.Yeah it’s a pretty dodgy remake
Anyone know If recreations have to have some sorta ‘difference’ to them to avoid paying fees to designers/kit makers etc of the original kit? Eg Nike. Classics etc etcYeah it’s a pretty dodgy remake
Technically Nike doesn't own the design, Its the clubs design as they own the intellectual property.Anyone know If recreations have to have some sorta ‘difference’ to them to avoid paying fees to designers/kit makers etc of the original kit? Eg Nike. Classics etc etc
No it isn't lolSouth's no sleeve sponsors no upper back
It's fairly apparent too many slots not enough sponsors..
Source ?No it isn't lol
South's no sleeve sponsors no upper back
It's fairly apparent too many slots not enough sponsors..
No it isn't lol
Source ?
Nah. I think one is wearing shorter white socks/ankle socks over his game socks. Or they could even be build into the shoe.Dragons continue to have sock issues. Hats off the the majority of players wearing the long sock however this sort of stuff has to be cleaned up. These players clearly have 2 different socks on.
View attachment 28289
Dragons continue to have sock issues. Hats off the the majority of players wearing the long sock however this sort of stuff has to be cleaned up. These players clearly have 2 different socks on.
View attachment 28289