I posted this very early on but if they wanted a badge, they should have done this. Knowing what we know now, I would change the the yellow into white and make the telstra logo coloured so that it would match exactly with the on field grass logo we saw last night.
View attachment 28064
Clubs don't just give sponsorship positions on on-field apparel away for nothing unless they have to. Doing so would devalue sponsorship and make it difficult to ask for more in the future. Sure, companies taking more than one position likely pay less than the desired combined value if the two positions were offered up separately. But to say that clubs wouldn't get paid more in those situations seems way off to me.Roosters and NZ warriors
Actually just whack their front sponsor on the back as well just to fill a slot..
I doubt they actually get paid more for it .
We just need a blanket rule 1 sponsor on the back, I'd say only broncos would blow up
Clubs don't just give sponsorship positions on on-field apparel away for nothing unless they have to. Doing so would devalue sponsorship and make it difficult to ask for more in the future. Sure, companies taking more than one position likely pay less than the desired combined value if the two positions were offered up separately. But to say that clubs wouldn't get paid more in those situations seems way off to me.
Nice kit differtiation today, bulldogs should be in a kit that isn’t blue and white!
I thought it looked strange without a top sponsor. Too much white on the back. Lottoland or another sponsor written in maroon would have looked better than empty space.how much better does Manly's away look now with only a main front, and sleeve sponsors. Actually don't mind it now.
Again reigniting last nights conversation, how much better does Manly's away look now with only a main front, and sleeve sponsors. Actually don't mind it now.
They actually have Ladbrokes as the lower back sponser but can’t use that jersey over in NZ. I think those jerseys they used yesterday were just a one off because they didn’t have any grip on the chest either.Dogs jersey looks much 'cleaner' as well with no ugly lower back sponsor cluttering it. No good for their bottom line but its a slick jersey.
Did Parra lose their lower back sponsor?
Id say bothSo with a lot of teams having ‘gaps’ on their jerseys. What do you guys put it down to? Teams not moving on their sponsorship prices or businessss have had enough?
Wait till round 16 when clubs start discounting their empty sponsor spaces for some quick cash. Stickers galore.So with a lot of teams having ‘gaps’ on their jerseys. What do you guys put it down to? Teams not moving on their sponsorship prices or businessss have had enough?
Do you think the light blue on the back of the shorts was an after thought after realising they didn't have enough of it on the jersey. I hope its not there for sponsorship space (not that the nrl would allow it) .Titans actually looks good on the field. Doesn't actually look like the Titans though..