strider
Post Whore
- Messages
- 78,983
it was terrible .... joey wasnt impressed lolWhat the f**k was with Channel 9's pre-game idea of showing two footy players playing in each other in Mario Kart?
Scintillating stuff.
it was terrible .... joey wasnt impressed lolWhat the f**k was with Channel 9's pre-game idea of showing two footy players playing in each other in Mario Kart?
Scintillating stuff.
He was good last year, but one season doesn't prove anything.I was so wrong about Lane. I totally bagged him as a signing. Thought he ha da decent trial but wanted to see him in a real game. And he was outstanding today.
He's an attacking player. With us in front on the scoreboard we didn't exactly need him.How long was Evans on the field for? You'd think with Brown off the field he would've seen more game time? Did he even get 20 mins?
It's a game where I thought our inexperience would hurt us. Players like Gower helped us close the game out, especially when it got a bit nervy.Gower was good old mr dependable when Nrown went down
He's an attacking player. With us in front on the scoreboard we didn't exactly need him.
Zero missed tackles, zero errors, zero penalties conceded. In the wet and in front by a narrow margin, it wasn't the type of game that suited him.He didn’t need to do anything impressive....he came on rolled his sleeves up, cut the crap out of his game and did his job... it was a solid stint
I didn't rate Lane either until last year when he had his first good season. Prior to that he was just another one of many merkins with potential.Rammy was always his staunchest supporter, but I, too, always thought he was a good player.
Solid first grader but also overrated. The best thing about him is that he can play long minutes. We already have plenty of that type of forward.While a win is a win, todays game was bad for our season, just because of the injury to Nathan Brown.
One of your best Pou.Solid first grader but also overrated. The best thing about him is that he can play long minutes. We already have plenty of that type of forward.
He'd also be on double or triple what Evans is on, so I hope he would play more minutes.I'd suggest if it was Junior Paulo, probably a worse defensive player than Evans, he would've played more than Evans, if not double the amount of minutes.
I disagree. If we were behind on the scoreboard we would need his offload.I'd also suggest that if we were down 14 nil Evana would've played about the same amount of time.
Every club needs them.He's essentially a Number 6 Middle Forward that looks good in a good team and shit anywhere else.
I didn't say he was no good. He could be our best player and still be overrated.One of your best Pou.
He is easily in our best 3 forwards and possibly best 5 players overall.
You said we have plenty of his type.I didn't say he was no good. He could be our best player and still be overrated.
Are you talking as a panthers fan?60% possesion
10-2 Penalty count in our favour
123 less tackles
Yet we missed more tackles and made less tackle breaks
2 points ahead with 5 to go.
Maybe I saw a different game. I thought the Panthers looked more skillfull and dangerous with ball. It was just poor ball handling in the wet that cost them.
Nikuore impressed me as did Taka with his offloads. Alvaro I thought missed easy tackles and was piss weak in his efforts for Tamou try. Looked a yard slow in my eyes. May need time to adjust to new playing weight.
Mannah plugged away, defense was very good. Ferguson was superb. Sivo lacked the power I thought he may have.
Pack has potential to be very good once Jnr,Terepo and Manu slot back in.
Maybe I saw a different game. I thought the Panthers looked more skillfull and dangerous with ball. It was just poor ball handling in the wet that cost them.
I thought you'd become the victim of some shady club's lax rules.60% possesion
10-2 Penalty count in our favour
123 less tackles
Yet we missed more tackles and made less tackle breaks
2 points ahead with 5 to go.
Maybe I saw a different game. I thought the Panthers looked more skillfull and dangerous with ball. It was just poor ball handling in the wet that cost them.
Nikuore impressed me as did Taka with his offloads. Alvaro I thought missed easy tackles and was piss weak in his efforts for Tamou try. Looked a yard slow in my eyes. May need time to adjust to new playing weight.
Mannah plugged away, defense was very good. Ferguson was superb. Sivo lacked the power I thought he may have.
Pack has potential to be very good once Jnr,Terepo and Manu slot back in.
No they were rubbish. Very poor performance by a top 4 side vs the wooden spooners. They were out played across the park, except for the Jennings bin period.
60% possesion
10-2 Penalty count in our favour
123 less tackles
Yet we missed more tackles and made less tackle breaks
2 points ahead with 5 to go.
Maybe I saw a different game. I thought the Panthers looked more skillfull and dangerous with ball. It was just poor ball handling in the wet that cost them.
Nikuore impressed me as did Taka with his offloads. Alvaro I thought missed easy tackles and was piss weak in his efforts for Tamou try. Looked a yard slow in my eyes. May need time to adjust to new playing weight.
Mannah plugged away, defense was very good. Ferguson was superb. Sivo lacked the power I thought he may have.
Pack has potential to be very good once Jnr,Terepo and Manu slot back in.
They were poor. We weren't much better but we were better.No they were rubbish. Very poor performance by a top 4 side vs the wooden spooners. They were out played across the park, except for the Jennings bin period.
I thought you'd become the victim of some shady club's lax rules.