St Tangles
Bench
- Messages
- 3,149
There was a massive difference between the previous 2 tackles and this onePerhaps he just... I dunno, shouldn't have had 43456366 priors?
There was a massive difference between the previous 2 tackles and this onePerhaps he just... I dunno, shouldn't have had 43456366 priors?
It won't set a new standardPriors have absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it’s not even penalty worthy and should never have been cited for that to begin with. Absolutely nothing wrong with that tackle. If that sets the new standard the game is cactus.
You see at least one of those tackles every weekend that Ravalawa just got suspended for go without charge. I think Ravalawa is being targeted based purely on his priors. I'm surprised the hit on Brad Parker which was hit of the round wasn't charged too.
Would love to hear what non-Dragons fans in here think about it.
I hear what you're saying but in most tackles the shoulder hits first then the arm or arms wrap.Unlucky but you can’t say he wasn’t warned after the first two times he was suspended. Is it worth 4 weeks no it’s not though. Rava needs to get his timing right. You can say the arm wrapping was only marginally after the shoulder, that just means it was after. Doesn’t matter if it was 0.1 or 2 seconds after, it’s still late. That said it’s not a 4 weekend. They need to dial back these should charge punishments, grade 1 should only be a fine imo.
Go home NRL. You’re drunk.
More like a Rooster tried to decapitate the next immortal. Was charged for it. Roosters then remind the judiciary he's a Roosters player and they backflip and remove the lenient punishment they originally gave him.So the roosters had a player binned for foul play that was subsequently deemed unworthy of a charge?
Makes sense.
Radley agreesThe tribal nature of rugby league works in the NRL's favour when they make these ridiculous decisions. Most supporters of other teams would probably think Ravalawa was hard done by, but don't really care if a Dragons winger gets 4 weeks. Likewise, most of us can see TKO's sin binning was an overreaction to an accident and spoiled what was a good game, but in the end it's the Roosters so no-one else gives a shit.
More like a Rooster tried to decapitate the next immortal. Was charged for it. Roosters then remind the judiciary he's a Roosters player and they backflip and remove the lenient punishment they originally gave him.
Then decide to make an example of the Dragons player. Ravalawa is the new Ryles.
I think its ridiculous. Shoulder tackle to the body shouldn't even be a penalty. To the head is another matter entirely.Would love to hear what non-Dragons fans in here think about it.
Munster protected species ?
Munster protected species ?
The fact that Hetherington has missed almost half a season through suspension from poorly executing actual rugby league tackles, while Muenster has missed exactly zero games for deliberately kicking and kneeing players on 3 occasions in that same time period is a neon sign for why the MRC and judiciary system sucks.
20 years ago Muenster would have been sent off for every one of those acts, and likely missed 15 games.