baselinepanther
Bench
- Messages
- 3,224
i call it out every time the NRL ratings for regionals are hilariously ... under ...reportedIt is adorable that you only call this out when you lose in the ratings,
i call it out every time the NRL ratings for regionals are hilariously ... under ...reportedIt is adorable that you only call this out when you lose in the ratings,
blessmaybe you're not a f**kstick
phhhhtttttt...... couldn;t keep a straight face & type that
Murdoch was from AdelaideThats not based on fact either. from 1992 the AFl were paid more for broadcast rights, they always drew more crowds, and they attracted more revenue.
i call it out every time the NRL ratings for regionals are hilariously ... under ...reported
Not all of wins ratings are countedunder reported by who? Nine is a friggin partner in oztam ffs
Murdoch was from Adelaide
why didn’t he go after afl for his pay tv network if it rated ?
Lmao licenses were irrelevantHe reportedly did make enquiries in late 1994 to John Elliot (who had been behind a proposed breakaway league in 1985) who declined involvement, but the AFL had perpetual club licensing since 1985 meant it was almost certain not to happen unless the AFL broke the licensing arrangements themselves.
Rugby league had much shorter license terms - from memory I think renewed annually - which lead to them being very easy to tease out of the league at the time. The license issue is covered in some depth in the book "The Commission we had to have" by Dave Trodden.
Garbage.Murdoch was from Adelaide
why didn’t he go after afl for his pay tv network if it rated ?
He spent 500 million on super league thats how desperate he wanted it
what weee the afl rights worth back then ? 5 million pa ?
the lions and swans both flirted with bankruptcy
indeed the lions were moved from Gold Coast and renamed bears to lions after killing off Fitzroy
Let’s see how foxsports fairs if they lose the nrl to Stan and only have afl as their main winter sport
Don’t know, dont care. Al I care about is the end outcome which is $’s to the game that tv is worth And the game can then spend to get bigger and better.
did we beat them for the bragging rights?
$402v$643 is all I care about!
There prepared to pay more iftv deals are showing tv ratings are only a very minor part of how the sports are valued, gf ratings mean little, 100k here or there doesn’t change what tv is willing to pay.
They will have competiton next deal, it wii be interesting to see what they will pay now they have competition!Murdoch was from Adelaide
why didn’t he go after afl for his pay tv network if it rated ?
He spent 500 million on super league thats how desperate he wanted it
what weee the afl rights worth back then ? 5 million pa ?
the lions and swans both flirted with bankruptcy
indeed the lions were moved from Gold Coast and renamed bears to lions after killing off Fitzroy
Let’s see how foxsports fairs if they lose the nrl to Stan and only have afl as their main winter sport
Not all of wins ratings are counted
Lmao licenses were irrelevant
Rupert literally set up new teams
he didn’t go with afl bc it was second best and he was correct
Oh lord. Hahahaha keep deluding yourself. He went for ARL cause it was easy pickings. Murdoch is nothing more than water, path of least resistance and easier to gain control, power and moneyLmao licenses were irrelevant
Rupert literally set up new teams
he didn’t go with afl bc it was second best and he was correct
Please spare us with the 5 metro nonsense. This totally ignores regional Queensland which has as many people as Perth.
90% metro 10% regional spend. its not me that doesnt value regional audiences lolIt is all he cares about, He hates regional areas
some people couldn't see the nose on their face if it was pointed out to them! There is no growth for the game in NSW, there's very little in Brisbane. New markets is where the opportunity for growth sits. If this so called Sydney blockbuster GF doesn't show them that, along with the mammoth tv deal disparity, , well there's no showing some people.So my understanding is AFL averaged 3.1m ish nationally (in afternoon time slot) while NRL averaged 2.4m nationally.
So both teams from NRL heartland in West Sydney don’t actually equate to high ratings nationally. Yet the NRL and NSW diehards are backslapping and booty slapping each other for a West Sydney GF? Moronic
It’s absolute idiocy to think Sydney or Queensland is the future of the game. Its
The future is NZ, Adelaide and Perth.
If you aren’t growing your economy you are going backwards. If you aren’t growing your code you are going backwards.
If Storm don’t make it, no one in Victoria watches the GF. When Storm make GF, Victoria and Queensland watch plus NSW watches hoping they lose. That’s an extremely valuable asset, if not the most valuable asset, the code has - yet they too busy waxing lyrical on all things Sydney they too dumb to see it.
Let’s say Cronulla got shifted to Perth and they made a GF. Even if Melbourne didn’t make it and it was Perth v Broncos or Perth v Panthers etc - you still have another 3m people in WA interested, as well as 7m in NSW and 5m in QLD.
And as West Australians are very parochial, love sport and will always back winners - they’d watch a Perth team in NRL GF in droves.
So my understanding is AFL averaged 3.1m ish nationally (in afternoon time slot) while NRL averaged 2.4m nationally.
So both teams from NRL heartland in West Sydney don’t actually equate to high ratings nationally. Yet the NRL and NSW diehards are backslapping and booty slapping each other for a West Sydney GF? Moronic
AFL averaged 3.1m in the afternoon. NRL will come in around 2.9m for the AU and with NZ would reach 3.1 or thereabouts.
Ratings would have been fine if it hadnt blow out early. Parra fairy tale would have a similar effect to the Western Bulldogs win a few years back
You know mine don’t own win anymore don’t you ?which of wins ratings do you think arent counted