Beavers Headgear
Coach
- Messages
- 10,056
Tigers have terminated Nofoaluma, talk of legal acrtion coming from his side
Last edited:
Dragons will be all over thatTigers have terminated Nofaloma, talk of legal acrtion coming from his side
I don’t see any reason lifting wouldn’t be allowed as long as the lifters don’t also obstruct potential tacklers.The rule change will likely see short goal line dropouts become the norm. Whether the kicking team turns the ball over due to losing the contest, or they concede a 10m play the ball for kicking out on the full, the field position won’t be that different.
Feels like only a couple of reasons for a long kick – protecting against a field goal, or if you're down a defender(s) for some reason.
Given that… yea, I see your point that this benefits the defending team more than anything.
I like the unpredictability of contested kicks, but I can see this being revisited as teams become more adept at recovering their own kicks and there becomes little benefit in forcing a drop out.
Does anyone know if the rules specifically prohibit union-style lifting? If not, receiving teams could set themselves up for that and swing the odds back in their favour.
They’ll have a sniff at anything at the momentDragons will be all over that
Totally unsurprised, he’s the natural choice as far AFB’s replacement goes. Is that for this year or 2025?Warriors reportedly have a 3 year, 2.2mil offer on the table to Hamlin-Uele
How would you guys feel about a Braden Hamlin-Uele/AFB trade with the Sharks? Obviously a downgrade for you, but I reckon one of the better options out there, and would give you probably $500k back in salary cap.
It wouldn’t be a 1 year rental, BHU is only contracted for 24’, so it could be Sharks agree to give you BHU (who you sign on a multi-year deal) in return for you releasing AFB for Sharks to sign him on a multi-year deal - but Sharks would want it to happen for 2024 season.
So…. How you guys feeling about this now? I had a feeling this is how it would play out.I guess you get rid of a ‘wantaway’ player, get a decent prop with plenty of upside at probably half the price, giving you around $500k in salary cap space - so essentially you get BHU plus another $500k player for AFB.
I’d be pretty happy if it goes ahead. He’s a good player and the Sharks are so stacked for next year they probably have to shed a forward. Just makes sense on most levels.So…. How you guys feeling about this now? I had a feeling this is how it would play out.
I reckon the swap is on the cards. Given you have offered BHU $700k, I’m guessing my quotes above are slightly out, as you’d have BHU plus around $300k to play with.
Yep was a good call. And agree with @SpaceMonkey; he's a good player and would be happy to see it happen. In terms of who's available from 2025 when AFB leaves, he's probably the pick of the lot.So…. How you guys feeling about this now? I had a feeling this is how it would play out.
I reckon the swap is on the cards. Given you have offered BHU $700k, I’m guessing my quotes above are slightly out, as you’d have BHU plus around $300k to play with.
Starting next yearTotally unsurprised, he’s the natural choice as far AFB’s replacement goes. Is that for this year or 2025?
Again completely unsurprising, if the injury happened while employed at the club it’s irrelevant whether he was released subsequently or not. Would be paid for by insurance anyway.Warriors to foot the bill for Volkmans shoulder op, CBA says they are liable for it
Great news. Regardless of the reasons, just glad the young fella isn't being left totally in the lurch. With any luck, his agent will be forgoing any commission due on the 200k he was paid out too.Warriors to foot the bill for Volkmans shoulder op, CBA says they are liable for it
I don't want a swap, I want AFB to honour his word and play tough for us this year.So…. How you guys feeling about this now? I had a feeling this is how it would play out.
I reckon the swap is on the cards. Given you have offered BHU $700k, I’m guessing my quotes above are slightly out, as you’d have BHU plus around $300k to play with.
Agree, but I guess the question would be how committed would he be if there was an out he's denied... I'd expect professionalism, but I've been disappointed beforeI don't want a swap, I want AFB to honour his word and play tough for us this year.
Oh mate I agree, I'm not exactly betting the house on him producing another season like last year. I know what motivation is like, only the greats keep fronting up no matter what the situation...not sure that's him. Hope I'm proven horribly wrong and he smells a chance at a GF/premiership, which he's never had.Agree, but I guess the question would be how committed would he be if there was an out he's denied... I'd expect professionalism, but I've been disappointed before
Completely get that view. That being said, if both clubs have long term deals with AFB/BHU in place, there’s a risk that if you leave them with their current club, and they get injured on their watch (see Volkman), you could find yourself with a lame duck the following year. Plus if the swap doesn’t happen, both clubs have a player who may have 1 eye on next year.I don't want a swap, I want AFB to honour his word and play tough for us this year.
If he's part of a swap then that would be professionalism.Agree, but I guess the question would be how committed would he be if there was an out he's denied... I'd expect professionalism, but I've been disappointed before
Yea definitely fishy.Pangai Jr has been at Brisbane training. Rumours are he will play for then the 2nd half of the year.
IMO nrl shouldn’t allow it, the whole Pangai saga reeks