Only two club matches, good result.
KP gets a dead rubber game, good for him.
I think they’ll bring brimson in. Otherwise yeah, hammer to fullback and maybe a swan song for gagsPonga did ask not to be considered for Origin this year.
So I'd assume the hammer will take the throne.
I think they’ll bring brimson in. Otherwise yeah, hammer to fullback and maybe a swan song for gags
Of course Carrigan and Fifita were going to defend Walsh.Lol at Fifita turning up to testify because they are mates, and then being told by a supreme court judge that his testimony is worthless
20 year old thinks he's hot shit. shocker.As it is, he’ll continue to think he’s bigger and more important than he actually is. Spoilt brat.
I'm sorry you lost.Embarrassing work from the NRL
Farcical.
This sort of bullshit adds nothing to the whole "anti-Broncos conspiracy" thing. If anything it just adds fuel to the fire. The prosecution could not have f**ked up their case any more, and Walsh gets 3 games? It's a f**king laugh.
Maybe we should lobby the NRL to not include the Dolphins game in his suspension like the Pennies did with one of their players in last years finals series....
Farcical.
This sort of bullshit adds nothing to the whole "anti-Broncos conspiracy" thing. If anything it just adds fuel to the fire. The prosecution could not have f**ked up their case any more, and Walsh gets 3 games? It's a f**king laugh.
Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never harm me
Except for when you are Luai who shoved an assistant ref and Walsh who said some mean words next to one
Blatant bias from NSW and anti Broncos Judiciary
I'm deadly serious in saying this - just from watching the footage it seemed completely obvious to me that he was innocent? Carrigan says something to him and he swears at Carrigan. That's....literally what happened, and we have the footage.
That was particularly so, in circumstances where the evidence of player Walsh was that had understood player Carrigan’s words to mean that he should “think and be smart”.
If that was his understanding, there was simply no need to ask player Carrigan what he had meant.
That factor tended against a conclusion that the words were said to player Carrigan as opposed to the referee.
In particular, the majority rejected the player’s evidence that he was not complaining to the referee when he said to him “I stopped running, I stopped running”.
This is the Judiciary view on that according to NRL.com
You can quite clearly hear Carrigan say “slow your brain” and Walsh goes “what does that f**king mean c***”.I'm deadly serious in saying this - just from watching the footage it seemed completely obvious to me that he was innocent? Carrigan says something to him and he swears at Carrigan. That's....literally what happened, and we have the footage.