The Game 2023 NRL Match Review Charges & Judiciary

[Pjf04b]

Especially not in your fantasy world.
what do you expect from a thug, it his third and subsequent offence

 

[The Villain]

Jack Bird should have stopped play to have his ankle strapped so that the bunker would have ample opportunity to put his coffee down and scroll through the last minute or so and decide that Matterson performed a copybook hip drop just the way they did for Jack DeBellin last week. And then tell the ref that Matterson should go to the bin which would allow the Dragons to probably not win anyway.

 

[Saxon]

what do you expect from a thug, it his third and subsequent offence

Exactly. What do people expect from Luai?

 

[Apey]

One read of the Panthers forum will tell you most of those lunatics thought the Luai hit was barely report worthy.

 

[Munky]

One read of the Panthers forum will tell you most of those lunatics thought the Luai hit was barely report worthy.

On NAS.

Nothing to see here.

 

[League Unlimited News]

Eels v Dragons​

Blake Lawrie (St George Illawarra)

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle
• 5th minute, on Arthur Miller-Stephen
• Base penalty $1500
• 3 year incident free discount
• His options:
  $1000: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $750: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

Ryan Couchman (St George Illawarra)

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle
• 70th minute, on Mitch Moses
• Base penalty $1500
• His options:
  $1500: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $1000: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

Raiders v Wests Tigers​

Jack Wighton (Canberra)

• Grade 1 Contrary Conduct
• 80th minute, to a match official
• Base penalty $1500
• 3rd+ offence last 12 months
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $3000: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

NRLW
No charges from Raiders v Tigers

Eels v Knights​

Kennedy Cherrington (Parramatta)

• Grade 3 Dangerous Throw
• 46th minute, on Laishon Albert-Jones
• 2nd+ offence last 12 months
• Referred to Judiciary
• PLEA: TBC

Caitlan Johnston (Newcastle)

• Grade 2 Careless High Tackle
• 61st minute, on Kelsey Clark
• Base penalty 2 matches
• Her options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR 1 match: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

NRL Match Review & Judiciary Charges: Round 23 & NRLW Round 3 » League Unlimited

leagueunlimited.com

 

[skeepe]

Haha Jack Wighton gets charged for being mean to a match official that nobody even noticed, but Daine Laurie goes off his nut screaming and shouting like a maniac and it's all good.

And the lack of a charge for a "high" tackle shows that the last Tigers penalty was also bullshit.

 

[Captain Apollo]

Nathan Brown has taken the early guilty plea.

Source: https://www.roosters.com.au/news/2023/08/07/nrl-judiciary-update-round-23/

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Haha Jack Wighton gets charged for being mean to a match official that nobody even noticed, but Daine Laurie goes off his nut screaming and shouting like a maniac and it's all good.

And the lack of a charge for a "high" tackle shows that the last Tigers penalty was also bullshit.

Teddy swore at the ref this week too, crickets.

 

[Danish]

Haha Jack Wighton gets charged for being mean to a match official that nobody even noticed, but Daine Laurie goes off his nut screaming and shouting like a maniac and it's all good.

And the lack of a charge for a "high" tackle shows that the last Tigers penalty was also bullshit.

skeepe: the match review committee charging wighton proves they are incompetent and biased

Also skeepe: the match review committee not charging wighton proves the referees are incompetent and biased

 

[skeepe]

skeepe: the match review committee charging wighton proves they are incompetent and biased

Also skeepe: the match review committee not charging wighton proves the referees are incompetent and biased

I was criticising the lack of a charge for the other players. If you’re going to charge one player for mean words, be consistent.

Defending the consistency of the match review committee is an odd hill to die on, but you do you buddy.

 

[Valheru]

Teddy swore at the ref this week too, crickets.

Sir teddy can do what he wants

Ref deserved it

 

[Maximus]

Especially not in your fantasy world.
what do you expect from a thug, it his third and subsequent offence

Agreed, Luai is a thug

Panthers v Storm​

Jarome Luai (Penrith)

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle
• 47th minute, on Nelson Asofa-Solomona
• Base penalty $1500
• 3rd+ offence last 12 months
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $3000: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

 

[Peach & Apricot]

Sir teddy can do what he wants

Ref deserved it

Like be Origin fullback and captain when he's no longer good enough to perform at that level.

 

[Valheru]

Like be Origin fullback and captain when he's no longer good enough to perform at that level.

Correct

Now you're getting it

Carrying a whole state on his back with a dud halfback for 5 years has its privileges.

 

[Bazal]

Correct

Now you're getting it

Carrying a whole state on his back with a dud halfback for 5 years has its privileges.

Did he play five years with Myth Piss?

Man that sucks

 

[Saxon]

Swear at the ref, get 3 weeks.
Call him a cheat - and how else do you interpret "You’re trying hard to give this to them. You’re trying hard" - slap on the wrist.

 

[Danish]

I was criticising the lack of a charge for the other players. If you’re going to charge one player for mean words, be consistent.

Defending the consistency of the match review committee is an odd hill to die on, but you do you buddy.

You were complaining about inconsistency with your first sook.

You then wanted to use Jackie boy not being charged for his stiff arm as proof the tigers shouldn’t have got their penalty. So apparently you take the MRC’s decisions as correct when it suits

 

[Pumpkin]

You've got to look at intent, which is hard to prove, but you can feel it and so can referees. Two players can swear around the referee but one is just frustrated and the other one has violent intent. There will be a different punishment.

 

[Canard]

Fancy Annersley making a song and dance about the repercussions of a high tackle after letting Luai off Scott free.

He should have said "there will be consequences, for some"