titoelcolombiano
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,645
I completely respect that everyone has their own preferences, but I prefer the tournaments to see different sides match up against each other and to give more nations top quality matches.I’m a bit old school when it comes to tests and much prefer a 3 match series over these one off ‘tournaments‘.
a series feels like they are playing for something, these one offs feel like exhibition games.
Ideally this year should have been
Australia v nz
Samoa v fiji
png v france
Eng v tonga
same for women.
8 games a weekend for 3 weeks.
far more worthwhile.
Oh man do I miss the four nations. As a game we can't afford not to big up the Aus, NZ, Eng dynamic and have them play each other every year. Then throw in the best of the challengers.
Due to the growing competitiveness in the international game it would have to be a 6 nations min at this point but 6 is a difficult number to structure a tournament into a four week window so I'd have an 8 nations (two pools of four and a final between the pool winners) or two 4 Nations tournaments, a championship and bowl with P&R and regional qualifying structures under the bowl.
4N Championship: Aus, NZ, Eng, Samoa
4N Bowl: Tonga, Fiji, PNG, France
Europe: Wales, Ireland, Scotland, Italy
MEA: South Africa, Lebanon, Nigeria, Ghana
Americas: USA, Canada, Jamaica, Chile
Asia Pacific: Cooks, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Japan
In many ways this is better than the traditional world cup structure and a return to the RLWC format of the 80s & 90s where matches were played over a 4 year cycle that culminated in a final.
Any minnow that makes their way even to the bowl stage has to earn their way there by winning consistently and having a decent player pool (IRL should ensure that only full members with proper domestic comps can enter so even if the team is fully heritage, the game is being played and developed at home).