That’s exactly right. It’s also why the length of our game is perfect and quarters are a bad idea. Look at the fumblers as an example. Their game takes too long and they have too many games meaning scheduling is a disaster. We can actually schedule2 more games in by going to 20. They simply can’t if they went to 20. They are already doubling up.I think the biggest appeal with Fox's coverage of the NRL is that each game has it's own timeslot. In the past, there used to be two Saturday night games at 7:30pm.
Now it's an easy flow on from one game to the next in a seemless way. Eg, Super Saturday, 3pm, 5:30pm and 7:30pm. You are not missing anything.
.
That’s exactly right. It’s also why the length of our game is perfect and quarters are a bad idea. Look at the fumblers as an example. Their game takes too long and they have too many games meaning scheduling is a disaster. We can actually schedule2 more games in by going to 20. They simply can’t if they went to 20. They are already doubling up.
Anyone got afl pay tv number
Wookie blocked me after I called him an afl troll a few years back lmao
Down in here somewhere
Me too, but there are other ways you can get in that aren`t difficult.W
Wookie blocked me after I called him an afl troll a few years back lmao
Quarters would change the fabric of the game. A team could be attacking their opponents try line at 19min 40 sec mark with a full set. If Quarters came in, they would only have a couple of plays at best.
The NRL could easily go to 20 teams with ten timeslots. On Saturday, the kick off schedules could be 2pm,,4pm, 6pm, 8pm. And on Sunday, 12pm, 2pm and 4pm, provided that NZ 2 come in.
In the first month of the season, due to warm weather, you could bring in Monday night games at 7pm.
W
Wookie blocked me after I called him an afl troll a few years back lmao
I think the biggest appeal with Fox's coverage of the NRL is that each game has it's own timeslot. In the past, there used to be two Saturday night games at 7:30pm.
God had to be a decade ago I’d forgotten about that. You could put the screen and watch both.I know this was true of a Friday and the live/delay broadcast would be different in NSW and QLD...but how far back was the Saturday night thing?
God had to be a decade ago I’d forgotten about that. You could put the screen and watch both.
Yeah it was before I retired the first time so about that at the latestI was going to say had to be pre simulcast, so 2011 at the latest
I know this was true of a Friday and the live/delay broadcast would be different in NSW and QLD...but how far back was the Saturday night thing?
After boggling, what explanation does your mind bring forth?Mind boggles that fox pays so much for afl games it doesn’t have exclusively
The answer to that question would be found in what he`s thinking when he lays in bed at night in the dark, staring at the ceiling.After boggling, what explanation does your mind bring forth?
There is strong opposition to private health care in the UK. Similar resistance to public health care in the US. In both cases it largely derives from that section of the population who believe that change would involve them paying twice.
Broncos v Dragons crowd 26k - low side, Fox rating 335k - high side.
Looks to me there is a cohort of NRL fans who when they take out a Fox subscription are less inclined to buy a membership and attend games.
The equivalent AFL fans are less likely to take out a Fox subscription and more likely to buy a membership and attend games. This is disappointing from an NRL crowd point of view, but the quid pro quo should be the NRL get a lot more money from Fox.
I've read all the defences of why AFL is deemed more valuable to TV and none of them are commercially plausible. There's something rotten at the heart of the broadcast deals.
Fox ratings for 3 rounds of NRL are striking. Experts said the STB numbers would fall with the advent of streaming. The opposite seems to be happening for NRL games this year.
Comparable AFL round 1 ratings are poor.
PVL must see all these figures. What does he think? Not what does he say he thinks in interviews. What does he really think?