2024 TV and Streaming Ratings Discussion

[Wb1234]

So there is no way that viewers would not of tuned out once the result was known?

Would’ve affected the average lol

high average means no

 

[Vlad59]

So there is no way that viewers would not of tuned out once the result was known?

I’ll try again. An average of 3.43 million watched the game. That is a huge number. They obviously kept watching mate.. Otherwise the average would be lower. Do you know what average means?

 

[Vlad59]

Would’ve affected the average lol

high average means no

That’s right. It isn’t very complicated

 

[Wb1234]

 

[Foreign Legion]

Ratings would have been higher had the blues freaking won...."sigh"

 

[Chris Reid]

Would’ve affected the average lol

high average means no

It wasn't even half of the Matildas game

 

[Chris Reid]

That’s right. It isn’t very complicated

Can you blokes keep going! This is great material

 

[Billythekid]

Hopefully the decider rates even better! The womens game is growing fast.

 

[Iamback]

Would’ve affected the average lol

high average means no

Yes. It was broken up across the night in 30 min periods.

3.4m is the average. That drops off across the night as kids go to bed for example

 

[Iamback]

Ratings would have been higher had the blues freaking won...."sigh"

It isn't so much if they won.

halftime was 9pm. The score was 20-6 with 13 v 12. Perfect time to check out if you are a casual fan

 

[Iamback]

I’ll try again. An average of 3.43 million watched the game. That is a huge number. They obviously kept watching mate.. Otherwise the average would be lower. Do you know what average means?

Do you is the question?

Say this game went like this:

8.00- 4.5m
8.30-4.5m
9.00-4m
9.30 3m
10.00 2m

Game 2 is closer

8.00. 4.5m
8.30 4.5m
9.00 4m
9.30 3.5m
10.00 3m

Which is going to average more viewers across the game?

The aim is to keep as many viewers as possible for as long as possible so the average of the 2 hour game is higher.

Melbourne for example averaged 100k more viewers last year. Ask yourself why they wouldn't of stayed engaged for as long this year?

 

[Vlad59]

Do you is the question?

Say this game went like this:

8.00- 4.5m
8.30-4.5m
9.00-4m
9.30 3m
10.00 2m

Game 2 is closer

8.00. 4.5m
8.30 4.5m
9.00 4m
9.30 3.5m
10.00 3m

Which is going to average more viewers across the game?

The aim is to keep as many viewers as possible for as long as possible so the average of the 2 hour game is higher.

Melbourne for example averaged 100k more viewers last year. Ask yourself why they wouldn't have stayed engaged for as long this year?

I’d say the game averaged 3.43 million viewers across the length of the game. Thanks for all your hard work. You proved nothing.

 

[Dark Corner]

You aren't going to win a game against a great team being a player down.

As good as RL is. It is a flaw in the sport

We need to follow Rugby Unions new rules.
https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/06...roduce-the-20-minute-red-card-rule-from-union

 

[Iamback]

I’d say the game averaged 3.43 million viewers across the length of the game. Thanks for all your hard work. You proved nothing.

Yes a program at 9.30pm is going to rate the same as 8pm.

f**ken idiot

 

[Iamback]

We need to follow Rugby Unions new rules.
https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/06...roduce-the-20-minute-red-card-rule-from-union

Yes. Something like that with longer suspensions is a better outcome

 

[Vlad59]

Yes a program at 9.30pm is going to rate the same as 8pm.

f**ken idiot

That’s why it’s an average. Now settle petal. For a game to average 3.44 million over its entirety means a great percentage kept watching for a long period. It’s the only think that makes sense. This will be one of the top 5 rating shows this year. I have no idea what your point is and to be frank I don’t think you know either. Sadly you appear to be quite stupid.

 

[Vlad59]

The post game had 1.1m.

So the game lost 2m people as a result of the winner being known since 7min

Just for your information ‘post game’ means the game was over. It had stopped. The number of viewers dropped because there was no football left to watch. The ball was no longer in play. There were no more kicks or tackles. The referees and players had clocked off. It’s not unusual in those circumstances for people to stop watching. I typed that slowly so you could understand it. Sleep well little man.

 

[Vlad59]

It wasn't even half of the Matildas game

Tv ratings obviously aren’t your strong point.

 

[Vlad59]

Can you blokes keep going! This is great material

Are you still flying to England to watch that 4th grade soccer team? Or was that just another one of your lies? Asking for a friend.

 

[NRLMad]

It wasn't even half of the Matildas game

Matildas got 1.1m WSOO got 1.068m