This looks like a wicket for Haze IMO.I think it's enough. I reckon it'll be a nice close game and would have like Faulkner to grab us a few more runs but I think 220 will be enough.
Of course we have to bowl well. But it looks like a dreadfully slow wicket so pressure will be paramount. Force up the run rate, it's too hard to score quickly
This looks like a wicket for Haze IMO.
There's been some variable bounce. Not a huge amount but more than the test.Lol. It's every bit as shit as the test pitch.
Wadeitis is contagiousDisappointing from Smith..Too many of those this summer
If there is a match fixer in the world that hasn't been caught yet.....You know your cricket side sux when you keep picking Umar Akmal
lLOL!! Gilchrist was around for about 4 years as a keeper before Healy was replaced. Healy played a year too long but he was easily the best keeper i have seen. He used to go whole summers without missing chances.Healy is the worst commentator in world cricket, deadset
"At this rate they'll score 50", yes Healy, because Australia were 0/10 after 2 as well.. f**king mongoloid, you were a rubbish batsmen and you're an even worse commentator, if Gilchrist was around any earlier you'd be wasting in a pension home
I agree...in terms of the skills involved in wicket-keeping, best I've ever seen.lLOL!! Gilchrist was around for about 4 years as a keeper before Healy was replaced. Healy played a year too long but he was easily the best keeper i have seen. He used to go whole summers without missing chances.
Shit commentator and clueless when it comes to judging players though.
Some people really need to let things go in regards to comparing wicket-keepers to Gilchrest. In the history of cricket, there have only ever been two wicket-keeper with whom I'd class as exceptional batsman..Gilly and Dhoni. Alec Stewart was also very solid. Every other wicket-keeper in history really scratches for their runs.