What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2nd Test: Australia v Pakistan at Melbourne on Dec 26-30, 2016

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
That hotspot was a mile away from the ball, and out of sync with snickers, which in turn spiked up when the ball was nowhere near bat or gloves... atrocious decision
 
  • Like
Reactions: JW

AusKnightRKO

First Grade
Messages
7,404
Where was this said hotspot? If it was the one on the ball, thats via the pitch... Don't know what he was looking at?
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,755
Hot spot showed nothing and the little surge was after the ball went passed the glove, not sure there was enough evidence to overturn that.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
68,385
that little mark from snicko was after the ball past the bat, how the hell did thy give it out????
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,041
Yeah it was a pretty poor decision.....Nowhere near the evidence needed to overturn the decision. Snicko "evidence" is a joke sometimes, they interpret any tiny little bump as an edge or a glove. There's nothing suggesting contact on hotspot and no appropriate noise, but they seem to want to give things out
 

JW

Coach
Messages
12,657
Very bunker-esque of the third ump that one. The slightest bright dot about on the top glove, miles from the line of the ball, was the only thing remotely visible for mine. SFA on the bat or the bottom glove, certainly not anything that could be conclusively considered a brush from the ball. Given the onfield decision, that's a rough one. Oh well.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,614
Very harsh.

Gee what's the story with Mark Nicolas? Back in hospital again? That can't be good.
 

Latest posts

Top