Lol you sure are a fiery douche sack.
No - I'm quite calm.
No wonder the Aussies on here love trolling the hell out of you.
Ad hominem im personam. Totally irrelevant to you claiming three games when its in fact 9. You told me to wake up as he has played a mere "3 games" in a row. I duly obliged and woke you up to the fact its 9 in a row, not a mere 3. It is a sum total of 35 games to bot where he opened in 14 of them.
Don't be so swift to tell people to wake up in future when you are totally and utterly wrong.
What instructions does he have for a start.
According McMillan today? Targets are set but the batsman can override. He is scoring too slow. That is why he cannot maintain a place in the side over the past couple of seasons. You think it is because he is too good for the team?
Secondly, the innings where he played in ODI one or two had absolutely no need to create strike rate.
And the other 7? And the remaining 5 sum opening? And the 20 innings not opening?
Nine ODIs without being a first choice player and slotting into different roles proves nothing.
It proves that its not a mere three games in a row like you said. 9 games in a row and he's still slow - just like his 14 games opening in sum, and his 35 games in total. But hey - you want to give him a "chance". Perhaps you really mean, yet another chance?
 
You mean the bloke who gets regularly tonked around the park? Batting is good but his bowling needs a lot of improvement to be considered without peer.
Corey Anderson – the million dollar all rounder. Averages 35 at SR 123 and 24 with the ball at 6.3 bowling a lot of death and powerplay overs.
So who is his allrounder peer?
Santner? Santner goes for more runs with the ball not really death bowling (6.65) with wickets at 46.57, and gets less runs with the bat (27) at a slower pace (111). Corey has him beat easy.
Neesham? Neesham goes for more runs per over (6.4) – not really a death bowler, and averages 34.35 for a wicket, gets less runs (21.63) at a lower SR (95.58).
Oh you want 5 bowlers in the team? You want Santner, an inferior batsman at 6? And a bowler at 8 instead of Santner? And say goodbye to Corey’s batting? For a “superior” bowler – well lets how that superior bowler looks with some regular death and powerplay bowling.
Pick fights with me all you like. But try and pick a reasonable one.
“Wake up”. Corey Anderson is
without peer currently in NZ as a limited over ODI all rounder. It is why he is the undisputed #1 for the #6 batting role when fit.
He bowls like Mitch McLeakin (Corey does death overs for 6.3 and averages 24 with the ball) -McLeakin (5.95 with this nice SL series but still 28.2 for wicket but bats at 19 runs at a 64 SR) and bats better and faster than McCullum (~30 at 108SR as a specialist batsman).
I like you as a poster. You started this by telling me in response to my post that I should “wake up” when you had the facts wrong.
If you want to continue the rift - be my guest. I’m awake. Or I'm happy to cyber shake hands and walk away from this rift, but I can be stubborn and immature over it too should you choose that path. If you choose the latter, start upping your game. Try and make critical arguments and analysis and not mere ad hominem like El Diablo. I like intellectual stimulation, not name calling.